Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude Opus 4.5
77
Holo3-35B-A3B
75
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.5 #9 · Holo3-35B-A3B unranked
Pick Claude Opus 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Holo3-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.
Agentic
+20.1 difference
Claude Opus 4.5
Holo3-35B-A3B
$5 / $25
$null / $null
46 t/s
N/A
1.01s
N/A
200K
64K
Pick Claude Opus 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Holo3-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.
Claude Opus 4.5 has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 77 versus 75. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Claude Opus 4.5 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 64K for Holo3-35B-A3B.
Claude Opus 4.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 77 to 75. The biggest single separator in this matchup is OSWorld-Verified, where the scores are 66.3% and 82.6%.
Holo3-35B-A3B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.6 versus 62.5. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.