Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Claude Opus 4.5
78
0/8 categoriesHolo3-35B-A3B
~78
1/8 categoriesClaude Opus 4.5· Holo3-35B-A3B
Treat this as a split decision. Claude Opus 4.5 makes more sense if you need the larger 200K context window; Holo3-35B-A3B is the better fit if agentic is the priority.
Claude Opus 4.5 and Holo3-35B-A3B finish on the same overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Claude Opus 4.5 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 64K for Holo3-35B-A3B.
BenchLM keeps the benchmark table and the operator tradeoffs on the same page so a better score does not hide a materially slower, pricier, or smaller-context model.
Runtime metrics show N/A when BenchLM does not have a sourced snapshot for that exact model. The scoring rules and freshness policy are documented on the methodology page.
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Holo3-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| AgenticHolo3-35B-A3B wins | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 59.3% | — |
| BrowseComp | 73% | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | 68% | 77.8% |
| Coding | ||
| HumanEval | 91% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified | 80.9% | — |
| LiveCodeBench | 57% | — |
| SWE-bench Pro | 62% | — |
| Multimodal & Grounded | ||
| MMMU-Pro | 94% | — |
| OfficeQA Pro | 87% | — |
| Reasoning | ||
| MuSR | 93% | — |
| BBH | 87% | — |
| LongBench v2 | 82% | — |
| MRCRv2 | 81% | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 37.6% | — |
| Knowledge | ||
| MMLU | 90.8% | — |
| GPQA | 87% | — |
| SuperGPQA | 95% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 81% | — |
| HLE | 20% | — |
| FrontierScience | 84% | — |
| SimpleQA | 95% | — |
| Instruction Following | ||
| IFEval | 90% | — |
| Multilingual | ||
| MGSM | 90% | — |
| MMLU-ProX | 84% | — |
| Mathematics | ||
| AIME 2023 | 99% | — |
| AIME 2024 | 99% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 98% | — |
| HMMT Feb 2023 | 95% | — |
| HMMT Feb 2024 | 97% | — |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | 96% | — |
| BRUMO 2025 | 96% | — |
| MATH-500 | 89% | — |
Claude Opus 4.5 and Holo3-35B-A3B are tied on overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Holo3-35B-A3B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.8 versus 65.8. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.