Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Claude Opus 4.5
78
0/8 categoriesHolo3-122B-A10B
~79
Winner · 1/8 categoriesClaude Opus 4.5· Holo3-122B-A10B
Pick Holo3-122B-A10B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Opus 4.5 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 200K context window.
Holo3-122B-A10B finishes one point ahead overall, 79 to 78. That is enough to call, but not enough to treat as a blowout. This matchup comes down to a few meaningful edges rather than one model dominating the board.
Holo3-122B-A10B's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 78.9 against 65.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is OSWorld-Verified, 68% to 78.8%.
Claude Opus 4.5 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 64K for Holo3-122B-A10B.
BenchLM keeps the benchmark table and the operator tradeoffs on the same page so a better score does not hide a materially slower, pricier, or smaller-context model.
Runtime metrics show N/A when BenchLM does not have a sourced snapshot for that exact model. The scoring rules and freshness policy are documented on the methodology page.
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Holo3-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| AgenticHolo3-122B-A10B wins | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 59.3% | — |
| BrowseComp | 73% | — |
| OSWorld-Verified | 68% | 78.8% |
| Coding | ||
| HumanEval | 91% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified | 80.9% | — |
| LiveCodeBench | 57% | — |
| SWE-bench Pro | 62% | — |
| Multimodal & Grounded | ||
| MMMU-Pro | 94% | — |
| OfficeQA Pro | 87% | — |
| Reasoning | ||
| MuSR | 93% | — |
| BBH | 87% | — |
| LongBench v2 | 82% | — |
| MRCRv2 | 81% | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 37.6% | — |
| Knowledge | ||
| MMLU | 90.8% | — |
| GPQA | 87% | — |
| SuperGPQA | 95% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 81% | — |
| HLE | 20% | — |
| FrontierScience | 84% | — |
| SimpleQA | 95% | — |
| Instruction Following | ||
| IFEval | 90% | — |
| Multilingual | ||
| MGSM | 90% | — |
| MMLU-ProX | 84% | — |
| Mathematics | ||
| AIME 2023 | 99% | — |
| AIME 2024 | 99% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 98% | — |
| HMMT Feb 2023 | 95% | — |
| HMMT Feb 2024 | 97% | — |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | 96% | — |
| BRUMO 2025 | 96% | — |
| MATH-500 | 89% | — |
Holo3-122B-A10B is ahead overall, 79 to 78. The biggest single separator in this matchup is OSWorld-Verified, where the scores are 68% and 78.8%.
Holo3-122B-A10B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 78.9 versus 65.8. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.