Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude Opus 4.5
77
Holo3-122B-A10B
75
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.5 #9 · Holo3-122B-A10B unranked
Pick Claude Opus 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Holo3-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.
Agentic
+16.4 difference
Claude Opus 4.5
Holo3-122B-A10B
$5 / $25
$null / $null
46 t/s
N/A
1.01s
N/A
200K
64K
Pick Claude Opus 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Holo3-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority.
Claude Opus 4.5 has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 77 versus 75. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Claude Opus 4.5 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 64K for Holo3-122B-A10B.
Claude Opus 4.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 77 to 75. The biggest single separator in this matchup is OSWorld-Verified, where the scores are 66.3% and 78.8%.
Holo3-122B-A10B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 78.9 versus 62.5. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.