Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Muse Spark

Head-to-head comparison across 5benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Opus 4.5

80

VS

Muse Spark

80

4 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.5 #5 · Muse Spark unranked

Treat this as a split decision. Claude Opus 4.5 makes more sense if reasoning is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model; Muse Spark is the better fit if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Claude Opus 4.5
62.5vs59

+3.5 difference

Coding

Claude Opus 4.5
65.9vs61.7

+4.2 difference

Reasoning

Claude Opus 4.5
64.4vs42.5

+21.9 difference

Knowledge

Claude Opus 4.5
66.2vs50.4

+15.8 difference

Multimodal

Muse Spark
70.6vs80.4

+9.8 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5

Muse Spark

Price (per 1M tokens)

$null / $null

N/A

Speed

46 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

1.01s

N/A

Context Window

200K

262K

Quick Verdict

Treat this as a split decision. Claude Opus 4.5 makes more sense if reasoning is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model; Muse Spark is the better fit if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

Claude Opus 4.5 and Muse Spark finish on the same provisional overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The provisional headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Muse Spark is the reasoning model in the pair, while Claude Opus 4.5 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Muse Spark gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 200K for Claude Opus 4.5.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (6)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark?

Claude Opus 4.5 and Muse Spark are tied on the provisional overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark?

Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66.2 versus 50.4. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark?

Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 65.9 versus 61.7. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark?

Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 64.4 versus 42.5. Muse Spark stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark?

Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.5 versus 59. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark?

Muse Spark has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.4 versus 70.6. Inside this category, ScreenSpot Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 13, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.