Claude Opus 4.5 vs Muse Spark

Head-to-head comparison across 5benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Opus 4.5

77

VS

Muse Spark

69

4 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.5 #5 · Muse Spark unranked

Pick Claude Opus 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Muse Spark only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Claude Opus 4.5
62.5vs59

+3.5 difference

Coding

Claude Opus 4.5
65.9vs61.7

+4.2 difference

Reasoning

Claude Opus 4.5
64.4vs42.5

+21.9 difference

Knowledge

Claude Opus 4.5
66.2vs50.4

+15.8 difference

Multimodal

Muse Spark
70.6vs80.4

+9.8 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5

Muse Spark

Price (per 1M tokens)

$null / $null

N/A

Speed

46 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

1.01s

N/A

Context Window

200K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Muse Spark only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

Claude Opus 4.5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 77 to 69. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Opus 4.5's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 64.4 against 42.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is ScreenSpot Pro, 45.7% to 84.1%. Muse Spark does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Muse Spark is the reasoning model in the pair, while Claude Opus 4.5 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Muse Spark gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 200K for Claude Opus 4.5.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (6)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark?

Claude Opus 4.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 77 to 69. The biggest single separator in this matchup is ScreenSpot Pro, where the scores are 45.7% and 84.1%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark?

Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 66.2 versus 50.4. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark?

Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 65.9 versus 61.7. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark?

Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 64.4 versus 42.5. Muse Spark stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark?

Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.5 versus 59. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Claude Opus 4.5 or Muse Spark?

Muse Spark has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.4 versus 70.6. Inside this category, ScreenSpot Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 8, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.