Model comparison
Composer 2 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)
Head-to-head evidence from 3 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Composer 2 and DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) share 3 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to Composer 2; 42 to DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max).
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 3
- Composer 2 only
- 2
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) only
- 42
- Comparable categories
- 2 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. Composer 2 makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) is the better fit if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 3 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Composer 2 and DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Composer 2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.50 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.14 input / $0.28 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max). That is roughly 8.9x on output cost alone. DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Composer 2.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Composer 2 | Δ | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Composer 258.0 | Margin→ 10.8 | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)68.8 |
| Agentic | Composer 261.7 | Margin→ 2.1 | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)63.8 |
| Knowledge | Composer 2Not measured | MarginNo overlap | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)55.3 |
| Math | Composer 2Not measured | MarginNo overlap | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)94.8 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
Terminal-Bench 2.0
AgenticA 61.7%B 56.9%Winner: Composer 2Δ 4.8Terminal-Bench 2.0: Composer 2 scored 61.7%; DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) scored 56.9%. Composer 2 wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Composer 2 | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Composer 2$0.5 input / $2.5 output | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)$0.14 input / $0.28 output | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Composer 2Not available | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Composer 2Not available | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Composer 2200K | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)1M | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
AgenticDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) wins15 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Composer 2 | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 61.7% | 56.9% | Composer 2 leads |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 73.2% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | — | 45.1% | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | — | 69% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1189 | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | — | 47.8% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 31.1% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 95% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 34.4% | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 831 | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | — | 39.6% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 81.3% | Not comparable |
| AA ITBenchSource | — | 31.5% | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | — | 22.9% | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | — | 35.6% | Not comparable |
CodingDeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) wins9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Composer 2 | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE MultilingualSource | 73.7% | 73.3% | Composer 2 leads |
| SWE-RebenchSource | 58% | — | Not comparable |
| React Native EvalsSource | 96.1% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 61.7% | 56.9% | Composer 2 leads |
| CodeforcesSource | — | 3052.0 | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 79% | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 52.6% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 56.2% | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | — | 44.9% | Not comparable |
Reasoning4 benchmarks
Knowledge13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Composer 2 | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 86.2% | Not comparable |
| SimpleQASource | — | 34.1% | Not comparable |
| Chinese-SimpleQASource | — | 78.9% | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | — | 88.1% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 88.1% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 34.8% | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 40.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 89.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 32.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -22.9% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 37.2% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 95.8% | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | — | 50.0% | Not comparable |
Math4 benchmarks
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Composer 2 | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1238 | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Composer 2 | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 79.2% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Which is better, Composer 2 or DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)?
Composer 2 and DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for coding, Composer 2 or DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)?
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 68.8 versus 58. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Composer 2 or DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)?
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 63.8 versus 61.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.