Capability
Unranked
field median 57.5
Not eligible for a public rank
Provider changes are easy to miss. Radar watches releases, pricing, deprecations, and incidents at the source.Provider changes are easy to miss.
See RadarModel profile · Cursor
Released Mar 19, 2026 — see all recent releases
Data as of August 7, 2026 · How the score is built
Agentic ranks #49. Particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
5 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Independent runtime speed has not been measured.
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Capability
Unranked
field median 57.5
Not eligible for a public rank
Price
$0.50input / $2.50 output
input median $1
blended $1.50
Speed
Not measured
field median 89 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
200Ktokens
field median 201,500
Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #49 of 132Percentile 63rdWeight 22%1 benchmarkVerified | 50.4 | #49 of 132 | 63rd | 22% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| CodingRank #56 of 132Percentile 58thWeight 20%4 benchmarksVerified | 51.0 | #56 of 132 | 58th | 20% | 4 benchmarks | Verified |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-Rebench | Score58% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 4.6 · 65.3% | Gap7.3 behind | WeightWeighted 20% | Benchmark exact |
| SWE Multilingual | Score73.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 89.5% | Gap15.8 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| React Native Evals | Score96.1% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Composer 2 · 96.1% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Score61.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 91.9% | Gap30.2 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Score61.7% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 91.9% | Gap30.2 behind | WeightWeighted 38% | Provider exact |
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Mar 19, 2026 · you are here
Composer 2Not publicly ranked · $0.5 / $2.5
May 18, 2026
Composer 2.5Not publicly ranked · $0.5 / $2.5
Base entry
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
We track Composer 2, but the public leaderboard excludes this profile until enough non-generated benchmark coverage is available. Only published rows appear above.
Composer 2 is a proprietary model with a 200K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
Official exact-value snapshot sourced from the Cursor Composer 2 report, Cursor's public evals page, and the public React Native Evals leaderboard.
Composer 2 sits in the Composer family with Composer 2.5, Composer 2 Fast. 5 of 381 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Agentic at #49, while its lowest eligible position is Coding at #56. particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
Cursor · Model release
Composer 2 has 5 source-displayable benchmark rows, but it does not qualify for a public overall rank. The available rows remain visible by category without being converted into a site-wide score. Missing evidence stays blank instead of being estimated from an earlier model.
Composer 2 ranks #56 out of 132 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 51/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Composer 2 ranks #49 out of 132 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 50.4/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Composer 2 belongs to the Composer family. Related tracked variants include Composer 2.5, Composer 2 Fast. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.
No. Composer 2 currently has 5 source-displayable rows across 381 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
Composer 2 has a reported context window of 200K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.
Related resources
Last updated August 7, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.