Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
DeepSeek V3.1 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 35 to 23. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
DeepSeek V3.1's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 35.4 against 9.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU, 33 to 80.1. GPT-4.1 nano does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
GPT-4.1 nano gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.1.
Pick DeepSeek V3.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4.1 nano only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.
DeepSeek V3.1
29.7
GPT-4.1 nano
65.2
DeepSeek V3.1
35.4
GPT-4.1 nano
9.8
DeepSeek V3.1
67
GPT-4.1 nano
83.2
DeepSeek V3.1 is ahead overall, 35 to 23. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU, where the scores are 33 and 80.1.
GPT-4.1 nano has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.2 versus 29.7. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeek V3.1 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 35.4 versus 9.8. Inside this category, AIME 2024 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-4.1 nano has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 83.2 versus 67. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.