DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-5.2

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

GPT-5.2 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 62 to 25. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.2's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 93.9 against 24.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SimpleQA, 24.9% to 95%. DeepSeek V3 does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.27 input / $1.10 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V3. That is roughly 7.3x on output cost alone. GPT-5.2 is the reasoning model in the pair, while DeepSeek V3 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-5.2 gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V3 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Agentic

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
BrowseComp
65.8%
Coming soon
MCP Atlas
60.6%
Coming soon
Toolathlon
46.3%

Coding

GPT-5.2

DeepSeek V3

42

GPT-5.2

55.6

42%
SWE-bench Verified
80%
Coming soon
HumanEval
91%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Pro
55.6%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MMMU-Pro
79.5%
Coming soon
MMMU-Pro w/ Python
80.4%

Reasoning

GPT-5.2

DeepSeek V3

24.9

GPT-5.2

93.9

24.9%
SimpleQA
95%
Coming soon
MuSR
93%

Knowledge

DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

69.6

GPT-5.2

66.8

59.1%
GPQA
92.4%
88.5%
MMLU
99%
75.9%
MMLU-Pro
Coming soon
Coming soon
SuperGPQA
95%
Coming soon
OpenBookQA
93%
Coming soon
HLE
34.5%

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Multilingual

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Mathematics

GPT-5.2

DeepSeek V3

90.2

GPT-5.2

96

39.2%
AIME 2024
99%
90.2%
MATH-500
Coming soon
Coming soon
AIME 2023
99%
Coming soon
AIME 2025
100%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2023
95%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2024
97%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2025
99.4%
Coming soon
BRUMO 2025
96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, DeepSeek V3 or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 is ahead overall, 62 to 25. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SimpleQA, where the scores are 24.9% and 95%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek V3 or GPT-5.2?

DeepSeek V3 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 69.6 versus 66.8. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3 or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 55.6 versus 42. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, DeepSeek V3 or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 96 versus 90.2. Inside this category, AIME 2024 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, DeepSeek V3 or GPT-5.2?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 93.9 versus 24.9. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 17, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.