Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash Base vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
N/A
No comparison
50.83/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Flash Base unranked (Not scored); Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite #111 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 24 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Flash Base; 20 to Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base only
24
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite only
20
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot availableGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite$0.25 input / $1.5 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot availableGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite205 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseNot availableGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite7.50 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V4 Flash Base1MGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteResult
AA Agentic IndexSource —6.2%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource —12.2%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource —31.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —7.1%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —642Not comparable
Gert LabsSource —38.46%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteResult
BigCodeBenchSource 56.8%—Not comparable
HumanEvalSource 69.5%—Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource —0.00%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource —34.7%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource —41.9%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteResult
BBHSource 86.9%—Not comparable
DROPSource 88.6%—Not comparable
HellaSwagSource 85.7%—Not comparable
WinoGrandeSource 79.5%—Not comparable
CLUEWSCSource 82.2%—Not comparable
LongBench v2Source 44.7%—Not comparable
AA-LCRSource —65.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource —1.1%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteResult
AGIEvalSource 82.6%—Not comparable
MMLUSource 88.7%—Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource 89.4%—Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 68.3%—Not comparable
MMMLUSource 88.8%—Not comparable
C-EvalSource 92.1%—Not comparable
CMMLUSource 90.4%—Not comparable
MultiLoKoSource 42.2%—Not comparable
SimpleQASource 30.1%—Not comparable
SuperGPQASource 46.5%—Not comparable
FACTS ParametricSource 33.9%—Not comparable
TriviaQASource 82.8%—Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource —25.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource —82.2%Not comparable
AA-HLESource —16.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource —-15.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource —36.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource —81.6%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteResult
GSM8KSource 90.8%—Not comparable
MATHSource 57.4%—Not comparable
CMathSource 93.6%—Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteResult
MGSMSource 85.7%—Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteResult
CharXivSource —73.2%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource —75.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash BaseGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteResult
AA-IFBenchSource —77.2%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek V4 Flash Base and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite today?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Base: Pricing unavailable Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: $0.25 input / $1.50 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

DeepSeek Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.