Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
According to BenchLM.ai, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ranks #71 out of 119 models on the provisional leaderboard with an overall score of 48/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for BenchLM's verified leaderboard. While not a frontier model, it offers specific advantages depending on the use case.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is a proprietary model with a 1M token context window. It processes queries without explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, offering faster response times and lower token usage.
This profile currently has 21 of 225 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.
Its strongest category is Reasoning (#38), while its weakest is Instruction Following (#86). This performance profile makes it particularly strong for complex reasoning, multi-step problem solving, and analytical tasks.
Ranking Distribution
Category rank across 8 benchmark categories — sorted by best rank
Category Performance
Scores across all benchmark categories (0-100 scale)
Category Breakdown
Agentic
#56Coding
#71Reasoning
#38Knowledge
#74Math
#57Multilingual
#74Multimodal
#52Inst. Following
#86Chatbot Arena Performance
Benchmark Details
Only benchmark rows with an attached exact-source record are shown here. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows are hidden from model pages.
Compare This Model
See how Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite stacks up against similar models
Frequently Asked Questions
How does Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite currently ranks #71 out of 119 models on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard with an overall score of 48 (estimated). It is created by Google and features a 1M context window.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite good for knowledge and understanding?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ranks #74 out of 119 models in knowledge and understanding benchmarks with an average score of 35.6. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite good for coding and programming?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ranks #71 out of 119 models in coding and programming benchmarks with an average score of 26.5. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite good for reasoning and logic?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ranks #38 out of 119 models in reasoning and logic benchmarks with an average score of 58.7. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ranks #56 out of 119 models in agentic tool use and computer tasks benchmarks with an average score of 41.8. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite good for multimodal and grounded tasks?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ranks #52 out of 119 models in multimodal and grounded tasks benchmarks with an average score of 58.4. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite good for instruction following?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ranks #86 out of 119 models in instruction following benchmarks with an average score of 44. There are stronger options in this category.
Does Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
Not yet. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite currently has 21 published benchmark scores out of the 225 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.
What is the context window size of Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite?
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has a context window of 1M, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.
Related Resources
Don't miss the next GPT moment
Which models moved up, what’s new, and what it costs. One email a week, 3-min read.
Free. One email per week.