Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)
76
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)
78
Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) #20 · Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) unranked
Pick Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.
Agentic
+2.1 difference
Coding
+19.6 difference
Knowledge
+13.9 difference
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max)
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)
$0.14 / $0.28
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
256K
Pick Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 78 versus 76. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)'s sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 73.9 against 60. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 56.9% to 65.4%. DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Qwen 3.6 Max (preview).
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 78 to 76. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 56.9% and 65.4%.
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.9 versus 60. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.7 versus 54.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.4 versus 63.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.