Capability
59.3/100
field median 57.2
#60 of 215 ranked models
Model profile · Alibaba
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) scores 59.3 out of 100 and ranks #60 of 215. This profile shows 9 source-displayable benchmark rows; its strongest eligible category is Agentic at #20. No comparable first-party API price is published in the catalog.
Data as of July 29, 2026 · How the score is built
Strongest published evidence
Agentic ranks #20. Particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
Validate before choosing
9 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.
Decision snapshot
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Price
Not listed
input median $1
No comparable first-party hosted token rate
Speed
Not measured
field median 107 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
256Ktokens
field median 256,000
Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
Capability shape
Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) category percentile values
- Agentic85th percentile
- Coding78th percentile
- ReasoningNot eligible
- KnowledgeNot eligible
- MathNot eligible
- MultilingualNot eligible
- MultimodalNot eligible
- Instruction followingNot eligible
The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.
Eligible category ranks
- Agentic#20/129
- Coding#30/130
- ReasoningNot ranked
- KnowledgeNot ranked
- MathNot ranked
- MultilingualNot ranked
- MultimodalNot ranked
- Inst. FollowingNot ranked
Top decileTop quartileMid-fieldNot eligible
How much of this is verified
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
- Agentic2/2 verified
- Coding4/4 verified
- ReasoningNot measured
- Knowledge1/1 verified
- Math2/2 verified
- MultilingualNot measured
- MultimodalNot measured
- Inst. FollowingNot measured
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured
Spec sheet
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
- API model ID
- Not published
- Context window
- 256K
- Maximum output
- Not sourced yet
- Knowledge cutoff
- Not sourced yet
- Input modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Output modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Parameters
- Not disclosed by the provider
- Availability
- Not sourced yet
- Cloud regions
- Not tracked yet
- Lifecycle
- Current
- API capabilities
- Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
- Prompt caching
- Not documented in the pricing record
- Self-host
- Weights are not published
- Rate limits
- Not tracked yet
Category score record
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #20 of 129Percentile 85thWeight 22%2 benchmarksVerified | 56.8 | #20 of 129 | 85th | 22% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| CodingRank #30 of 130Percentile 78thWeight 20%4 benchmarksVerified | 57.4 | #30 of 130 | 78th | 20% | 4 benchmarks | Verified |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%1 benchmarkVerified | 68.1 | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| MathRank Not rankedWeight 5%2 benchmarksVerified | 41.8 | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Benchmark ledger
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
Coding4 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SciCodeScientific Code Benchmark | Score47% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Sakana Fugu · 60.1% | Gap13.1 behind | WeightWeighted 16% | Provider exact |
| SWE-bench Pro | Score57.3% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Mythos 5 · 80.3% | Gap23 behind | WeightWeighted 10% | Provider exact |
| NL2Repo | Score42.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GLM-5.2 · 48.9% | Gap6 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Score65.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 91.9% | Gap26.5 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
Agentic2 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Score65.4% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 91.9% | Gap26.5 behind | WeightWeighted 38% | Provider exact |
| QwenClawBench | Score59.0% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.7 Max · 64.3% | Gap5.3 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
Knowledge1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SuperGPQASuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation Across 285 Graduate Disciplines | Score73.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) · 73.9% | GapBest verified | WeightWeighted 7% | Provider exact |
Math2 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)FrontierMath v2 Tiers 1-3 | Score23.103% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 89.000% | Gap65.9 behind | WeightWeighted 30% | Benchmark exact |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)FrontierMath v2 Tier 4 | Score4.167% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 83.000% | Gap78.8 behind | WeightWeighted 10% | Benchmark exact |
Lineage
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Apr 20, 2026 · you are here
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)Score 59.3 · Price not listed
preview · preview
How to read this profile
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) ranks #60 of 215 on the public leaderboard with a score of 59.29/100. Its source-verified position is #44 of 103.
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) is a proprietary model with a 256K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
9 of 371 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Agentic at #20, while its lowest eligible position is Coding at #30. particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
Frequently asked questions
How does Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) ranks #60 out of 215 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 59.29/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 9 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.
Is Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) good for knowledge and understanding?
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has source-displayable benchmark coverage for knowledge and understanding, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) good for coding and programming?
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) ranks #30 out of 130 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 57.4/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Is Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) good for mathematics?
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) ranks #20 out of 129 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 56.8/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Does Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
No. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) currently has 21 source-displayable rows across 371 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
What is the context window size of Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has a reported context window of 256K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.
Last updated July 29, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Watch Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) in the weekly brief
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.