Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Grok 4

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

58.88/100
Margin
1.5pts
winning →
60.42/100
1 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Flash #61 (Estimated); Grok 4 #50 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek V4 Flash and Grok 4 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 21 results are unique to DeepSeek V4 Flash; 15 to Grok 4.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
DeepSeek V4 Flash only
21
Grok 4 only
15
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick Grok 4 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V4 Flash only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Grok 4 has the cleaner BenchAlign overall profile here, landing at 60.42 versus 58.88. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

DeepSeek V4 Flash gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Grok 4.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek V4 Flash and Grok 4
CategoryDeepSeek V4 FlashΔGrok 4
MathDeepSeek V4 Flash40.8Margin 25.5Grok 415.3
AgenticDeepSeek V4 Flash49.1MarginNo overlapGrok 4Not measured
CodingDeepSeek V4 Flash64.2MarginNo overlapGrok 4Not measured
KnowledgeDeepSeek V4 Flash38.8MarginNo overlapGrok 4Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek V4 Flash$0.14 input / $0.28 outputGrok 4Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek V4 FlashNot availableGrok 454 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek V4 FlashNot availableGrok 415.60 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek V4 Flash1MGrok 4128KDeepSeek V4 Flash lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 49.1%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 64%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 40.7%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 57.8%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 54.35%42.34%DeepSeek V4 Flash leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 74.9%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.7%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 49.1%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 69.7%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 49.1%Not comparable
React Native EvalsSource 72.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 45.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4Result
MRCR 1MSource 37.5%Not comparable
CorpusQA 1MSource 15.5%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 68.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 2.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4Result
MMLU-ProSource 83%Not comparable
SimpleQASource 23.1%Not comparable
Chinese-SimpleQASource 71.5%Not comparable
GPQASource 71.2%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 71.2%Not comparable
HLESource 8.1%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 33.3%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 87.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 23.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 3.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 41.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 64.2%Not comparable
MathDeepSeek V4 Flash wins
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4Result
HMMT Feb 2026Source 40.8%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource 41.9%Not comparable
ApexSource 1.0%Not comparable
Apex ShortlistSource 9.3%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 19.655%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.083%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1238Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 68.8%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashGrok 4Result
AA-IFBenchSource 53.7%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4?

Grok 4 is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 60.42 to 58.88.

Which is better for math, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4?

DeepSeek V4 Flash has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 40.8 versus 15.3. Grok 4 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.