Skip to main content
Radar

Five or fewer confirmed AI changes, with original sources, on mornings when something changed.A free source-linked morning brief.

See the free Radar Brief

Grok 4

EstablishedReleased Jul 9, 2025ProprietaryNon-Reasoning128K context

Released Jul 9, 2025 see all recent releases

Decision reading
Grok 4 scores 59.6 out of 100 and ranks #82 of 230. This profile shows 4 source-displayable benchmark rows. No comparable first-party API price is published in the catalog.

Data as of September 2, 2026 · How the score is built

Strongest published evidence

Published rows are visible, but no category has enough eligible evidence for a comparative rank.

Validate before choosing

4 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.

Decision snapshot

Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.

Capability

59.6/100

field median 59.1

#82 of 230 ranked models

Price

API rate not published

input median $1

No comparable first-party hosted token rate

Speed

54tok/s

field median 90 tok/s

First token 15.6 s

Context

128Ktokens

field median 256,000

Reported for this model; direct source link not stored

How much of this is verified

Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.

  1. Agentic1/1 verified
  2. Coding1/1 verified
  3. ReasoningNot measured
  4. KnowledgeNot measured
  5. Math2/2 verified
  6. MultilingualNot measured
  7. MultimodalNot measured
  8. Inst. FollowingNot measured
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured

Spec sheet

Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.

API model ID
Not published
Context window
128K
Maximum output
Not sourced yet
Knowledge cutoff
Not sourced yet
Input modalities
Not sourced yet
Output modalities
Not sourced yet
Parameters
Not disclosed by the provider
Availability
Not sourced yet
Cloud regions
Not tracked yet
Lifecycle
Established
API capabilities
Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
Prompt caching
Not documented in the pricing record
Self-host
Weights are not published
Rate limits
Not tracked yet

Category score record

Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticWeight 22%1 benchmarkVerifiedScore pending
CodingRank Not rankedWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerified77.5
ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MathRank Not rankedWeight 5%2 benchmarksVerified38.6
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured

Benchmark ledger

Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.

Coding1 row
Coding benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
React Native EvalsScore72.6%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Composer 2 · 96.1%

Gap23.5 behindWeightDisplay only
Agentic1 row
Agentic benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
Gert LabsGert Labs Composite Game BenchmarkScore42.34%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Opus 4.8 · 72.97%

Gap30.6 behindWeightDisplay only
Benchmark exact
Math2 rows
Math benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)FrontierMath v2 Tiers 1-3Score19.655%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 89.000%

Gap69.3 behindWeightWeighted 30%
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)FrontierMath v2 Tier 4Score2.083%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 83.000%

Gap80.9 behindWeightWeighted 10%

Lineage

The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. A successor's displayed score stays at least 0.1 points above its predecessor; raw benchmark rows do not move. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.

  1. Jul 9, 2025 · you are here

    Grok 4

    Score 59.6 · Price not listed

Base entry

How to read this profile

The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.

Grok 4 ranks #82 of 230 on the public leaderboard with a score of 59.56/100. Its source-verified position is #45 of 105.

Grok 4 is a proprietary model with a 128K context window. No explicit reasoning mode is documented in this profile.

4 of 416 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.

Radar

Grok 4 release history

Full release history

Radar confirmed these at the source. Already tracking Grok 4? See the free Radar Brief for what changes next.

Frequently asked questions

How does Grok 4 perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Grok 4 ranks #82 out of 230 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 59.56/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 4 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.

Is Grok 4 good for coding and programming?

Grok 4 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for coding and programming, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is Grok 4 good for mathematics?

Grok 4 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is Grok 4 good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?

Grok 4 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for agentic tool use and computer tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Does Grok 4 have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

No. Grok 4 currently has 16 source-displayable rows across 416 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

What is the context window size of Grok 4?

Grok 4 has a reported context window of 128K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.

Compare Grok 4 with every tracked model409 comparisons

Last updated September 2, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.

Watch Grok 4 in the weekly brief

Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.