Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
87
Exaone 4.0 32B
66
Verified leaderboard positions: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) #2 · Exaone 4.0 32B unranked
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
Knowledge
+15.7 difference
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max)
Exaone 4.0 32B
$1.74 / $3.48
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
128K
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 87 to 66. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 87 to 66. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 87.5% and 81.8%.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 66.1. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.