Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Exaone 4.0 32B
65
GPT-5.2
81
Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Knowledge
+10.6 difference
Exaone 4.0 32B
GPT-5.2
N/A
$1.75 / $14
N/A
73 t/s
N/A
130.34s
128K
400K
Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
GPT-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 81 to 65. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.2's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 92.4 against 81.8.
GPT-5.2 gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
GPT-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 81 to 65.
GPT-5.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 92.4 versus 81.8. Exaone 4.0 32B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.