Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Exaone 4.0 32B
63
GPT-5.2
79
Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Knowledge
+10.6 difference
Exaone 4.0 32B
GPT-5.2
N/A
$1.75 / $14
N/A
73 t/s
N/A
130.34s
128K
400K
Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
GPT-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 79 to 63. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.2's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 92.4 against 81.8.
GPT-5.2 gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
GPT-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 79 to 63.
GPT-5.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 92.4 versus 81.8. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.