Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Exaone 4.0 32B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 83 to 48. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Exaone 4.0 32B's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 81.8 against 59.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU-Pro, 81.8% to 78.9%.
Pick Exaone 4.0 32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok 3 Mini only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Exaone 4.0 32B
81.8
Grok 3 Mini
59.8
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Exaone 4.0 32B is ahead overall, 83 to 48. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 81.8% and 78.9%.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 59.8. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.