Skip to main content

Gemma 4 12B vs GLM-5

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Gemma 4 12B

53

VS

GLM-5

67

2 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 12B unranked · GLM-5 #22

Pick GLM-5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 12B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Gemma 4 12B
72vs63.2

+8.8 difference

Reasoning

GLM-5
43.4vs60.8

+17.4 difference

Knowledge

Gemma 4 12B
77.8vs70.7

+7.1 difference

Operational Comparison

Gemma 4 12B

GLM-5

Price (per 1M tokens)

N/A

$1 / $3.2

Speed

N/A

74 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

1.64s

Context Window

256K

200K

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 12B only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you need the larger 256K context window.

GLM-5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 67 to 53. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-5's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 60.8 against 43.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU-Pro, 77.2% to 85.7%. Gemma 4 12B does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Gemma 4 12B is the reasoning model in the pair, while GLM-5 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Gemma 4 12B gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for GLM-5.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Gemma 4 12B or GLM-5?

GLM-5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 67 to 53. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU-Pro, where the scores are 77.2% and 85.7%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 12B or GLM-5?

Gemma 4 12B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.8 versus 70.7. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 12B or GLM-5?

Gemma 4 12B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 63.2. GLM-5 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for reasoning, Gemma 4 12B or GLM-5?

GLM-5 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 60.8 versus 43.4. Gemma 4 12B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.