Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemma 4 12B vs GPT-4.1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

47.29/100
Margin
3.8pts
winning →
OpenAI
51.11/100
2 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemma 4 12B #137 (Estimated); GPT-4.1 #108 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemma 4 12B and GPT-4.1 share 13 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to Gemma 4 12B; 7 to GPT-4.1.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
13
Gemma 4 12B only
10
GPT-4.1 only
7
Comparable categories
2 / 8

Pick GPT-4.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemma 4 12B only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

GPT-4.1 is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 51.11 to 47.29. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Gemma 4 12B is the reasoning model in the pair, while GPT-4.1 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-4.1 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Gemma 4 12B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemma 4 12B and GPT-4.1
CategoryGemma 4 12BΔGPT-4.1
MathGemma 4 12B77.5Margin 73.4GPT-4.14.1
KnowledgeGemma 4 12B77.5Margin 11.2GPT-4.166.3
CodingGemma 4 12BNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.154.6
ReasoningGemma 4 12B43.4MarginNo overlapGPT-4.1Not measured
MultimodalGemma 4 12B69.1MarginNo overlapGPT-4.1Not measured
Inst. FollowingGemma 4 12BNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-4.187.4

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Gemma 4 12BB · GPT-4.1
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 78.8%B 66.3%
    Winner: Gemma 4 12BΔ 12.5
    GPQA: Gemma 4 12B scored 78.8%; GPT-4.1 scored 66.3%. Gemma 4 12B wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemma 4 12BGPT-4.1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemma 4 12BNot availableGPT-4.1$2 input / $8 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemma 4 12BNot availableGPT-4.1108 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemma 4 12BNot availableGPT-4.11.02 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemma 4 12B256KGPT-4.11MGPT-4.1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BGPT-4.1Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 36.3%47.1%GPT-4.1 leads
Gert LabsSource 25.65%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BGPT-4.1Result
AA-SciCodeSource 38.2%38.1%Gemma 4 12B leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 54.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BGPT-4.1Result
BBHSource 53%Not comparable
MRCRv2Source 43.4%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 55.3%61.0%GPT-4.1 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
KnowledgeGemma 4 12B wins
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BGPT-4.1Result
GPQASource 78.8%66.3%Gemma 4 12B leads
GPQA-DSource 78.8%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 77.2%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 5.2%Not comparable
MMMLUSource 83.4%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 22.0%19.4%Gemma 4 12B leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 75.3%66.6%Gemma 4 12B leads
AA-HLESource 14.8%4.6%Gemma 4 12B leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -51.9%-36.2%GPT-4.1 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 16.0%24.2%GPT-4.1 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.8%79.6%GPT-4.1 leads
MMLUSource 90.2%Not comparable
MathGemma 4 12B wins
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BGPT-4.1Result
AIME26Source 77.5%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 5.517%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BGPT-4.1Result
MMMU-ProSource 69.1%Not comparable
MathVisionSource 79.7%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source 48.7%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 69.7%61.2%Gemma 4 12B leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1068Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemma 4 12BGPT-4.1Result
AA-IFBenchSource 73.5%43.0%Gemma 4 12B leads
IFEvalSource 87.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Gemma 4 12B or GPT-4.1?

GPT-4.1 is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 51.11 to 47.29. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 78.8% and 66.3%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Gemma 4 12B or GPT-4.1?

Gemma 4 12B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.5 versus 66.3. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Gemma 4 12B or GPT-4.1?

Gemma 4 12B has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 77.5 versus 4.1. GPT-4.1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.