Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
GLM-4.7
68
Laguna XS.2
37
Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Laguna XS.2 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+9.6 difference
Coding
+15.5 difference
GLM-4.7
Laguna XS.2
$0 / $0
$0 / $0
82 t/s
N/A
1.10s
N/A
200K
131K
Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Laguna XS.2 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
GLM-4.7 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 68 to 37. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GLM-4.7's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 70.6 against 55.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 41% to 35.7%.
GLM-4.7 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 131K for Laguna XS.2.
GLM-4.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 68 to 37. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 41% and 35.7%.
GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 55.1. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GLM-4.7 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 45.3 versus 35.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.