Skip to main content

GLM-4.7 vs MiniMax M2.7

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-4.7

69

VS

MiniMax M2.7

62

1 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniMax M2.7 only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

MiniMax M2.7
45.3vs57

+11.7 difference

Coding

GLM-4.7
70.6vs53.7

+16.9 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-4.7

MiniMax M2.7

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$0.3 / $1.2

Speed

82 t/s

45 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

1.10s

2.53s

Context Window

200K

200K

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniMax M2.7 only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

GLM-4.7 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 69 to 62. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-4.7's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 70.6 against 53.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 41% to 57%. MiniMax M2.7 does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

MiniMax M2.7 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for GLM-4.7. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GLM-4.7 is the reasoning model in the pair, while MiniMax M2.7 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, GLM-4.7 or MiniMax M2.7?

GLM-4.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 69 to 62. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 41% and 57%.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or MiniMax M2.7?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.6 versus 53.7. Inside this category, SWE-Rebench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7 or MiniMax M2.7?

MiniMax M2.7 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 57 versus 45.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 1, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.