Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 nano vs Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
41.1/100
No comparison
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4.1 nano #170 (Estimated); Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 #131 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4.1 nano and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 21 results are unique to GPT-4.1 nano; 0 to Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1.

Updated July 28, 2026
Shared results
0
GPT-4.1 nano only
21
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-4.1 nano and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

GPT-4.1 nano is priced at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1. GPT-4.1 nano has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 64K for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4.1 nanoMixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4.1 nano$0.1 input / $0.4 outputMixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1$0 input / $0 outputMixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4.1 nano181 tok/sMixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4.1 nano0.63 sMixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4.1 nano1MMixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.164KGPT-4.1 nano lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.2%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 17.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 63Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1Result
AA Coding IndexSource 11.1%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 25.9%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1Result
AA-LCRSource 17.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1Result
MMLUSource 80.1%Not comparable
GPQASource 50.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 9.6%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 51.2%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 3.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -56.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 13.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.4%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 1.034%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 40.1%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 998Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1Result
IFEvalSource 83.2%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 32.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-4.1 nano and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-4.1 nano and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 today?

GPT-4.1 nano: $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 28, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.