Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
GPT-5.4 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 93 to 43. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.4's sharpest advantage is in multilingual, where it averages 96 against 87. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMLU, 99 to 82.
GPT-5.4 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.50 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens for GPT-4o mini. That is roughly 25.0x on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 is the reasoning model in the pair, while GPT-4o mini is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-5.4 gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 128K for GPT-4o mini.
Pick GPT-5.4 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4o mini only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
GPT-5.4
88
GPT-4o mini
82
GPT-5.4
87.7
GPT-4o mini
87.2
GPT-5.4
96
GPT-4o mini
87
GPT-5.4 is ahead overall, 93 to 43. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU, where the scores are 99 and 82.
GPT-5.4 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 88 versus 82. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.4 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 87.7 versus 87.2. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.4 has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 96 versus 87. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.