Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.4 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

60.89/100
Margin
2.3pts
← winning
Xiaomi
58.62/100
2 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.4 Pro #44 (Estimated); MiMo-V2.5 #62 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.4 Pro and MiMo-V2.5 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to GPT-5.4 Pro; 10 to MiMo-V2.5.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
1
GPT-5.4 Pro only
11
MiMo-V2.5 only
10
Comparable categories
2 / 8

Pick GPT-5.4 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

GPT-5.4 Pro has the cleaner BenchAlign overall profile here, landing at 60.89 versus 58.62. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

GPT-5.4 Pro's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 89.3 against 65.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMMU-Pro, 94% to 77.9%.

GPT-5.4 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 1M for MiMo-V2.5.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-5.4 Pro and MiMo-V2.5
CategoryGPT-5.4 ProΔMiMo-V2.5
AgenticGPT-5.4 Pro89.3Margin 23.5MiMo-V2.565.8
MultimodalGPT-5.4 Pro94.0Margin 15.0MiMo-V2.579.0
CodingGPT-5.4 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.556.1
ReasoningGPT-5.4 Pro83.3MarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.5Not measured
KnowledgeGPT-5.4 Pro58.7MarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.5Not measured
MathGPT-5.4 Pro46.9MarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.5Not measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · GPT-5.4 ProB · MiMo-V2.5
  1. MMMU-Pro

    Multimodal
    Source ↗
    A 94%B 77.9%
    Winner: GPT-5.4 ProΔ 16.1
    MMMU-Pro: GPT-5.4 Pro scored 94%; MiMo-V2.5 scored 77.9%. GPT-5.4 Pro wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.4 ProMiMo-V2.5Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.4 Pro$30 input / $180 outputMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.4 Pro74 tok/sMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.4 Pro151.79 sMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.4 Pro1.05MMiMo-V2.51MGPT-5.4 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticGPT-5.4 Pro wins
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMiMo-V2.5Result
BrowseCompSource 89.3%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 62.3%Not comparable
MM-ClawBenchSource 23.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 46.89%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 16.9%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMiMo-V2.5Result
SWE-bench ProSource 56.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMiMo-V2.5Result
ARC-AGI-2Source 83.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 30.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMiMo-V2.5Result
HLESource 58.7%Not comparable
FrontierScienceSource 36.7%Not comparable
FrontierScience ResearchSource 36.7%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 42.7%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMiMo-V2.5Result
IPhO 2025 (Theory)Source 93.5%Not comparable
FrontierMath (legacy)Source 50%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 50.000%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 37.500%Not comparable
MultimodalGPT-5.4 Pro wins
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProMiMo-V2.5Result
MMMU-ProSource 94%77.9%GPT-5.4 Pro leads
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source 87.7%Not comparable
CharXivSource 81%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1291Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, GPT-5.4 Pro or MiMo-V2.5?

GPT-5.4 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 60.89 to 58.62. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMMU-Pro, where the scores are 94% and 77.9%.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.4 Pro or MiMo-V2.5?

GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 89.3 versus 65.8. MiMo-V2.5 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GPT-5.4 Pro or MiMo-V2.5?

GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 94 versus 79. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.