Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
GPT-5.4 Pro
91
Holo3-35B-A3B
75
Pick GPT-5.4 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Holo3-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Agentic
+6.7 difference
GPT-5.4 Pro
Holo3-35B-A3B
$30 / $180
$null / $null
74 t/s
N/A
151.79s
N/A
1.05M
64K
Pick GPT-5.4 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Holo3-35B-A3B only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
GPT-5.4 Pro is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 91 to 75. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.4 Pro's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 89.3 against 82.6.
GPT-5.4 Pro is the reasoning model in the pair, while Holo3-35B-A3B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-5.4 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 64K for Holo3-35B-A3B.
GPT-5.4 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 91 to 75.
GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 89.3 versus 82.6. Holo3-35B-A3B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.