Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Grok 4.3
72
Interfaze Beta
77
Pick Interfaze Beta if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok 4.3 only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Knowledge
+36.0 difference
Multimodal
+7.0 difference
Grok 4.3
Interfaze Beta
$1.25 / $2.5
$1.5 / $3.5
209 t/s
N/A
12.36s
N/A
1M
1M
Pick Interfaze Beta if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok 4.3 only becomes the better choice if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Interfaze Beta is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 77 to 72. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Interfaze Beta's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 89.9 against 53.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMMU-Pro, 78.1% to 71.1%. Grok 4.3 does hit back in multimodal & grounded, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Interfaze Beta is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.50 input / $3.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.25 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens for Grok 4.3.
Interfaze Beta is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 77 to 72. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMMU-Pro, where the scores are 78.1% and 71.1%.
Interfaze Beta has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 89.9 versus 53.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Grok 4.3 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 78.1 versus 71.1. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.