Skip to main content

Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 15 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Margin
15.4pts
winning →
58.68/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B #159 (Estimated); Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) #62 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) share 15 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 14 results are unique to Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B; 2 to Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning).

Updated July 27, 2026
Shared results
15
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
14
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) only
2
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 15 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) is priced at $0.60 input / $3.60 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning).

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)
CategoryNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BΔQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)
CodingNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B32.0MarginNo overlapQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not measured
KnowledgeNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3MarginNo overlapQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not measured
MultimodalNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3MarginNo overlapQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not measured
Inst. FollowingNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B74.2MarginNo overlapQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B$0 input / $0 outputQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3.6 outputNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot availableQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot availableQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B256KQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)128KNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
OSWorldSource 47.4%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 45.3%95.6%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%23.1%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
GDPval-AASource 465962Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 19.9%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 15.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
SciCodeSource 32%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 27.8%42.0%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA Coding IndexSource 13.8%48.2%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 35.7%65.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
CritPtSource 0.0%1.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
MMLU-ProSource 77.3%Not comparable
GPQASource 72.2%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 72.2%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 14.9%33.7%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 46.9%89.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 5.3%27.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -56.0%-29.8%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 14.8%31.4%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 83.1%89.1%Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads
Math
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
AIME 2025Source 82.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
MMMUSource 70.8%Not comparable
MMLongBench-DocSource 57.5%Not comparable
CharXivSource 76.3%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource 57.8%Not comparable
Video-MME (w/o subtitle)Source 72.2%Not comparable
AI2D_TESTSource 88.5%Not comparable
RefCOCO (avg)Source 90.5%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 53.2%77.3%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Result
IFBenchSource 74.2%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 63.2%78.8%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) today?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.