Skip to main content
Radar

Keep up with the models you depend on. Follow price changes, retirements, and API updates.Follow the models you depend on.

Follow model changes

o3-mini

EstablishedReleased Jan 31, 2025ProprietaryReasoning200K context

Released Jan 31, 2025 see all recent releases

Decision reading
o3-mini scores 46.8 out of 100 and ranks #138 of 232. This profile shows 5 source-displayable benchmark rows; its strongest eligible category is Coding at #88. API pricing is $1.1 input and $4.4 output per million tokens.

Data as of September 10, 2026 · How the score is built

Strongest published evidence

Coding ranks #88. Particularly well-suited for software development and code generation tasks.

Validate before choosing

5 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Knowledge is its lowest eligible category at #134.

Decision snapshot

Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.

Capability

46.8/100

field median 56.2

#138 of 232 ranked models

Price

$1.10input / $4.40 output

input median $1

blended $2.75

Speed

160tok/s

field median 86.5 tok/s

First token 7.12 s

Context

200Ktokens

field median 256,000

Reported for this model; direct source link not stored

Capability shape

Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.

o3-mini category percentile values

  • AgenticNot eligible
  • Coding42nd percentile
  • ReasoningNot eligible
  • Knowledge27th percentile
  • MathNot eligible
  • MultilingualNot eligible
  • MultimodalNot eligible
  • Instruction followingNot eligible

The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.

Eligible category ranks

  1. AgenticNot ranked
  2. Coding#88/151
  3. ReasoningNot ranked
  4. Knowledge#134/183
  5. MathNot ranked
  6. MultilingualNot ranked
  7. MultimodalNot ranked
  8. Inst. FollowingNot ranked
Top decileTop quartileMid-fieldNot eligible

What it costs to get this score

Published API price against the public score. The x-axis uses a log scale; the dashed path marks models that are not beaten by a cheaper, higher-scoring option. Price uses average of published input and output rates.

Explore all models

The chart opens on the current model. Scroll horizontally to inspect the full price axis.

Current modelo3-mini · 46.8 score · $2.75 blended per million tokens
30405060708090$0.50$1$5$10$25↘ frontiero3-mini

Horizontal: blended price per million tokens, log scale · Vertical: public score

How much of this is verified

Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.

  1. AgenticNot measured
  2. Coding1/1 verified
  3. ReasoningNot measured
  4. Knowledge2/2 verified
  5. Math1/1 verified
  6. MultilingualNot measured
  7. MultimodalNot measured
  8. Inst. Following1/1 verified
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured

Spec sheet

Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.

API model ID
Not published
Context window
200K
Maximum output
Not sourced yet
Knowledge cutoff
Not sourced yet
Input modalities
Not sourced yet
Output modalities
Not sourced yet
Parameters
Not disclosed by the provider
Availability
Not sourced yet
Cloud regions
Not tracked yet
Lifecycle
Established
API capabilities
Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
Prompt caching
Not documented in the pricing record
Self-host
Weights are not published
Rate limits
Not tracked yet

Category score record

Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticWeight 22%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
CodingRank #88 of 151Percentile 42ndWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerified45.3
ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
KnowledgeRank #134 of 183Percentile 27thWeight 12%2 benchmarksVerified39.7
MathWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerifiedScore pending
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerifiedScore pending

Benchmark ledger

Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.

Coding1 row
Coding benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
SWE-bench VerifiedSoftware Engineering Benchmark VerifiedScore49.3%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 96%

Gap46.7 behindWeightWeighted 10%
Knowledge2 rows
Knowledge benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
GPQAGraduate-Level Google-Proof Q&AScore77.2%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 96%

Gap18.8 behindWeightWeighted 7%
MMLUMassive Multitask Language UnderstandingScore86.9%Versus best verified row

Best verified: o1 · 91.8%

Gap4.9 behindWeightDisplay only
Math1 row
Math benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
AIME 2024American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2024Score87.3%Versus best verified row

Best verified: o3-mini · 87.3%

GapBest verifiedWeightDisplay only
Inst. Following1 row
Inst. Following benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
IFEvalInstruction-Following EvalScore93.9%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Qwen3.5-27B · 95%

Gap1.1 behindWeightDisplay only

Published price history

This chart appears only when at least two dated first-party price records exist for the exact model. It shows rate changes, not an inferred cost trend.

0362025-042026-04Output priceInput price

2 dated first-party price records. The newest record lists $4.4 per million tokens.

Lineage

The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. A successor's displayed score stays at least 0.1 points above its predecessor; raw benchmark rows do not move. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.

  1. Jan 31, 2025 · you are here

    o3-mini

    Score 46.8 · $1.1 / $4.4

Mini

How to read this profile

The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.

o3-mini ranks #138 of 232 on the public leaderboard with a score of 46.83/100. Its source-verified position is #84 of 130.

o3-mini is a proprietary model with a 200K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.

o3-mini sits in the o3 family with o3, o3-pro. 5 of 434 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.

Its strongest eligible category is Coding at #88, while its lowest eligible position is Knowledge at #134. particularly well-suited for software development and code generation tasks.

Radar

o3-mini release history

Full release history

Radar confirmed these at the source. Use o3-mini in your work? Explore Radar to follow supported changes and choose your alerts.

Frequently asked questions

How does o3-mini perform overall in AI benchmarks?

o3-mini ranks #138 out of 232 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 46.83/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 5 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.

Is o3-mini good for knowledge and understanding?

o3-mini ranks #134 out of 183 eligible models for knowledge and understanding, with a public category score of 39.7/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Is o3-mini good for coding and programming?

o3-mini ranks #88 out of 151 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 45.3/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Is o3-mini good for mathematics?

o3-mini has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is o3-mini good for instruction following?

o3-mini has source-displayable benchmark coverage for instruction following, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Which sibling models are related to o3-mini?

o3-mini belongs to the o3 family. Related tracked variants include o3, o3-pro. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.

Does o3-mini have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

No. o3-mini currently has 9 source-displayable rows across 434 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

What is the context window size of o3-mini?

o3-mini has a reported context window of 200K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.

Compare o3-mini with every tracked model482 comparisons

Last updated September 10, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.

Watch o3-mini in the weekly brief

Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.