Capability
46.8/100
field median 56.2
#138 of 232 ranked models
Keep up with the models you depend on. Follow price changes, retirements, and API updates.Follow the models you depend on.
Follow model changesReleased Jan 31, 2025 — see all recent releases
Data as of September 10, 2026 · How the score is built
Share or export
Coding ranks #88. Particularly well-suited for software development and code generation tasks.
5 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Knowledge is its lowest eligible category at #134.
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Capability
46.8/100
field median 56.2
#138 of 232 ranked models
Price
$1.10input / $4.40 output
input median $1
blended $2.75
Speed
160tok/s
field median 86.5 tok/s
First token 7.12 s
Context
200Ktokens
field median 256,000
Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.
o3-mini category percentile values
The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.
Published API price against the public score. The x-axis uses a log scale; the dashed path marks models that are not beaten by a cheaper, higher-scoring option. Price uses average of published input and output rates.
The chart opens on the current model. Scroll horizontally to inspect the full price axis.
Horizontal: blended price per million tokens, log scale · Vertical: public score
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticWeight 22%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 22% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| CodingRank #88 of 151Percentile 42ndWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerified | 45.3 | #88 of 151 | 42nd | 20% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeRank #134 of 183Percentile 27thWeight 12%2 benchmarksVerified | 39.7 | #134 of 183 | 27th | 12% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| MathWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerified | Score pending | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerified | Score pending | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSoftware Engineering Benchmark Verified | Score49.3% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 96% | Gap46.7 behind | WeightWeighted 10% | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQAGraduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A | Score77.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 96% | Gap18.8 behind | WeightWeighted 7% | Provider exact |
| MMLUMassive Multitask Language Understanding | Score86.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: o1 · 91.8% | Gap4.9 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2024American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2024 | Score87.3% | Versus best verified row Best verified: o3-mini · 87.3% | GapBest verified | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFEvalInstruction-Following Eval | Score93.9% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Qwen3.5-27B · 95% | Gap1.1 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
This chart appears only when at least two dated first-party price records exist for the exact model. It shows rate changes, not an inferred cost trend.
2 dated first-party price records. The newest record lists $4.4 per million tokens.
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. A successor's displayed score stays at least 0.1 points above its predecessor; raw benchmark rows do not move. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Jan 31, 2025 · you are here
o3-miniScore 46.8 · $1.1 / $4.4
Mini
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
o3-mini ranks #138 of 232 on the public leaderboard with a score of 46.83/100. Its source-verified position is #84 of 130.
o3-mini is a proprietary model with a 200K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
o3-mini sits in the o3 family with o3, o3-pro. 5 of 434 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Coding at #88, while its lowest eligible position is Knowledge at #134. particularly well-suited for software development and code generation tasks.
OpenAI · Model release
Radar confirmed these at the source. Use o3-mini in your work? Explore Radar to follow supported changes and choose your alerts.
o3-mini ranks #138 out of 232 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 46.83/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 5 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.
o3-mini ranks #134 out of 183 eligible models for knowledge and understanding, with a public category score of 39.7/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
o3-mini ranks #88 out of 151 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 45.3/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
o3-mini has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
o3-mini has source-displayable benchmark coverage for instruction following, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
o3-mini belongs to the o3 family. Related tracked variants include o3, o3-pro. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.
No. o3-mini currently has 9 source-displayable rows across 434 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
o3-mini has a reported context window of 200K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.
Related resources
Last updated September 10, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.