Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Codex vs o3-mini

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 6 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

66.18/100
Margin
19.5pts
← winning
OpenAI
46.73/100
1 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.3 Codex #29 (Supported); o3-mini #143 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.3 Codex and o3-mini share 6 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 15 results are unique to GPT-5.3 Codex; 4 to o3-mini.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
6
GPT-5.3 Codex only
15
o3-mini only
4
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick GPT-5.3 Codex if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o3-mini only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 6 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

GPT-5.3 Codex is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 66.18 to 46.73. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.3 Codex's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 67.2 against 49.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Verified, 85% to 49.3%.

GPT-5.3 Codex is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.75 input / $14.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.10 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens for o3-mini. That is roughly 3.2x on output cost alone. GPT-5.3 Codex gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 200K for o3-mini.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-5.3 Codex and o3-mini
CategoryGPT-5.3 CodexΔo3-mini
CodingGPT-5.3 Codex67.2Margin 17.9o3-mini49.3
AgenticGPT-5.3 Codex71.4MarginNo overlapo3-miniNot measured
KnowledgeGPT-5.3 CodexNot measuredMarginNo overlapo3-mini77.2
Inst. FollowingGPT-5.3 CodexNot measuredMarginNo overlapo3-mini93.9

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · GPT-5.3 CodexB · o3-mini
  1. SWE-bench Verified

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 85%B 49.3%
    Winner: GPT-5.3 CodexΔ 35.7
    SWE-bench Verified: GPT-5.3 Codex scored 85%; o3-mini scored 49.3%. GPT-5.3 Codex wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.3 Codexo3-miniComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.3 Codex$1.75 input / $14 outputo3-mini$1.1 input / $4.4 outputo3-mini has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.3 Codex79 tok/so3-mini160 tok/so3-mini has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.3 Codex88.26 so3-mini7.12 so3-mini reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.3 Codex400Ko3-mini200KGPT-5.3 Codex lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 Codexo3-miniResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 77.3%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 64.7%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 86%28.7%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
Gert LabsSource 57.47%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 33.7%Not comparable
CodingGPT-5.3 Codex wins
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 Codexo3-miniResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 85%49.3%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
SWE-bench ProSource 56.8%Not comparable
SWE-RebenchSource 58.2%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 61.77%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 53.2%39.9%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 Codexo3-miniResult
AA-LCRSource 74.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 16.9%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 Codexo3-miniResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 44.3%19.0%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 91.5%74.8%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
AA-HLESource 39.9%8.7%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 9.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 51.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 86.9%Not comparable
MMLUSource 86.9%Not comparable
GPQASource 77.2%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 Codexo3-miniResult
AIME 2024Source 87.3%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 Codexo3-miniResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 78.5%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1193Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 Codexo3-miniResult
AA-IFBenchSource 75.4%Not comparable
IFEvalSource 93.9%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, GPT-5.3 Codex or o3-mini?

GPT-5.3 Codex is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 66.18 to 46.73. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 85% and 49.3%.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.3 Codex or o3-mini?

GPT-5.3 Codex has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 67.2 versus 49.3. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026