Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Data as of October 17, 2026 · How the score is built

EstablishedProprietaryReasoning

Released Apr 16, 2025200K context

o3

Decision readingo3 scores 45.4 out of 100 and ranks #120 of 224. This profile shows 1 source-displayable benchmark rows. API pricing is $2 input and $8 output per million tokens.

Released Apr 16, 2025 — see all recent releases

Decision snapshot

Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.

Capability

45.4/100

field median 49.6#120 of 224 ranked models

Public

#120of 224

Verified #67 of 88

Price

$2input / $8 output

input median $0.75blended $5

Speed

120tok/s

field median 92 tok/sFirst token 5.91 s

Context

200Ktokens

field median 256,000Reported for this model; direct source link not stored

Strongest published evidence

Published rows are visible, but no category has enough eligible evidence for a comparative rank.

Validate before choosing

1 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty.

Source-linked · 1 displayable benchmark row

Category score record

Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticWeight 22%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
CodingWeight 20%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
MathRank Not rankedWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerified
48.5

1 of 681 tracked benchmark slots have displayable evidence · bars run 0–100

Coverage details

How much of this is verified

Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.

  1. AgenticNot measured
  2. CodingNot measured
  3. ReasoningNot measured
  4. MultimodalNot measured
  5. KnowledgeNot measured
  6. MultilingualNot measured
  7. Inst. FollowingNot measured
  8. Math1/1 verified
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured

Benchmark ledger

Math opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.

Math1 row
Math benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)FrontierMath v2 Tiers 1-3Score33.333%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 93.684%

Gap60.4 behindWeightWeighted 30%

Bars run 0–100; the dark tick marks the best source-verified value

All 1 rows

What it costs to get this score

Published API price against the public score. The x-axis uses a log scale; the dashed path marks models that are not beaten by a cheaper, higher-scoring option. Price uses average of published input and output rates.

Current modelExplore all models

o3 · 45.4 score · $5 blended per million tokens

The chart opens on the current model. Scroll horizontally to inspect the full price axis.

405060708090100$0.10$0.50$1$5$10$25$50$100↘ frontiero3

Horizontal: blended price per million tokens, log scale · Vertical: public score

Published price history

This chart appears only when at least two dated first-party price records exist for the exact model. It shows rate changes, not an inferred cost trend.

024482025-042026-042026-07Output priceInput price

3 dated first-party price records. The newest record lists $8 per million tokens.

Lineage

The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Each score is estimated for that model; a relative can inform a sparse estimate but never sets a floor, so a newer release can score below an earlier one. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.

  1. Apr 16, 2025 · you are here

    o3

    Score 45.4 · $2 / $8

Spec sheet

Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.

API model ID
Not published
Context window
200K
Maximum output
Not sourced yet
Knowledge cutoff
Not sourced yet
Input modalities
Not sourced yet
Output modalities
Not sourced yet
Parameters
Not disclosed by the provider
Availability
Not sourced yet
Cloud regions
Not tracked yet
Lifecycle
Established
API capabilities
Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
Prompt caching
Not documented in the pricing record
Self-host
Weights are not published
Rate limits
Not tracked yet

How to read this profile

The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.

o3 ranks #120 of 224 on the public leaderboard with a score of 45.44/100. Its source-verified position is #67 of 88.

o3 is a proprietary model with a 200K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.

o3 sits in the o3 family with o3-mini, o3-pro. 1 of 681 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.

Last updated October 17, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.

Questions

How does o3 perform overall in AI benchmarks?

o3 ranks #120 out of 224 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 45.44/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 1 source-displayable benchmark row. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.

Is o3 good for mathematics?

o3 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Which sibling models are related to o3?

o3 belongs to the o3 family. Related tracked variants include o3-mini, o3-pro. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.

Does o3 have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

No. o3 currently has 14 source-displayable rows across 681 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

What is the context window size of o3?

o3 has a reported context window of 200K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.

Watch o3 in the weekly brief

Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,600+ readers.

Compare o3 with every tracked model953 comparisons