According to BenchLM.ai, Qwen3.6 Plus leads the QwenClawBench benchmark with a score of 57.2%, followed by Kimi K2.5 (54.3%) and GLM-5 (54.1%). The scores show moderate spread, with meaningful differences between the top tier and mid-tier models.

5 models have been evaluated on QwenClawBench. The benchmark falls in the Agentic category. This category carries a 22% weight in BenchLM.ai's overall scoring system. QwenClawBench is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About QwenClawBench

Year

2026

Tasks

Real-world agent workflows

Format

End-to-end agent evaluation

Difficulty

Broad real-world agentic execution

QwenClawBench appears in the Qwen3.6 launch comparisons as an internal real-world agent benchmark. BenchLM tracks it separately rather than merging it into other Claw-style benchmarks because the task mix and exact protocol are Qwen-specific.

Qwen3.6 launch benchmarks

BenchLM freshness & provenance

Version

QwenClawBench 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.