Skip to main content

GLM-5.1 vs GPT-5.4 nano

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

GLM-5.1

83

VS

GPT-5.4 nano

61

1 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5.1 #21 · GPT-5.4 nano unranked

Pick GLM-5.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 nano only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GLM-5.1
65.3vs42.9

+22.4 difference

Knowledge

GPT-5.4 nano
52.3vs53.2

+0.9 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-5.1

GPT-5.4 nano

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.4 / $4.4

$0.2 / $1.25

Speed

N/A

191 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

3.64s

Context Window

203K

400K

Quick Verdict

Pick GLM-5.1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 nano only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

GLM-5.1 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 83 to 61. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-5.1's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 65.3 against 42.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 63.5% to 46.3%. GPT-5.4 nano does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GLM-5.1 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.40 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $1.25 output per 1M tokens for GPT-5.4 nano. That is roughly 3.5x on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 nano gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 203K for GLM-5.1.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, GLM-5.1 or GPT-5.4 nano?

GLM-5.1 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 83 to 61. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 63.5% and 46.3%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5.1 or GPT-5.4 nano?

GPT-5.4 nano has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 53.2 versus 52.3. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-5.1 or GPT-5.4 nano?

GLM-5.1 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.3 versus 42.9. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GLM-5.1
API / mo$4,350
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even264M/day
GPT-5.4 nano
API / mo$1,088
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 11, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.