Skip to main content

GLM-5.1 vs GLM-5.2

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Sibling matchup inside the GLM-5 family.

GLM-5.1

74

VS

GLM-5.2

94

0 categoriesvs3 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: GLM-5.1 #30 · GLM-5.2 #9

GLM-5.1 makes more sense if you want this variant’s specific profile, while GLM-5.2 is the cleaner fit if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GLM-5.2
65.3vs81

+15.7 difference

Coding

GLM-5.2
60.9vs62.1

+1.2 difference

Knowledge

GLM-5.2
52.3vs67.2

+14.9 difference

Operational Comparison

GLM-5.1

GLM-5.2

Price (per 1M tokens)

$1.4 / $4.4

$1.4 / $4.4

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (first answer)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

203K

1M

Quick Verdict

GLM-5.1 makes more sense if you want this variant’s specific profile, while GLM-5.2 is the cleaner fit if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

GLM-5.1 and GLM-5.2 sit in the same GLM-5 family. This page is less about two unrelated model lineages and more about how the siblings trade off on benchmark shape, token costs, and practical limits like context window.

GLM-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 94 to 74. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GLM-5.2's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 81 against 65.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 63.5% to 81%.

GLM-5.2 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 203K for GLM-5.1.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-5.1 or GLM-5.2?

GLM-5.1 and GLM-5.2 are sibling variants in the GLM-5 family, so the right pick depends on whether you value the better benchmark line, cheaper tokens, or the larger context window. GLM-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard 94 to 74.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-5.1 or GLM-5.2?

GLM-5.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 67.2 versus 52.3. Inside this category, GPQA-D is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-5.1 or GLM-5.2?

GLM-5.2 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 62.1 versus 60.9. Inside this category, NL2Repo is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-5.1 or GLM-5.2?

GLM-5.2 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 81 versus 65.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GLM-5.1
API / mo$4,350
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even264M/day
GLM-5.2
API / mo$4,350
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.