Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
MAI-Thinking-1
65
MiMo-V2.5
72
Verified leaderboard positions: MAI-Thinking-1 #23 · MiMo-V2.5 unranked
Pick MiMo-V2.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MAI-Thinking-1 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Agentic
+19.8 difference
Coding
+14.9 difference
MAI-Thinking-1
MiMo-V2.5
N/A
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
256K
1M
Pick MiMo-V2.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MAI-Thinking-1 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
MiMo-V2.5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 72 to 65. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2.5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 65.8 against 46. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 46% to 65.8%. MAI-Thinking-1 does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
MiMo-V2.5 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for MAI-Thinking-1.
MiMo-V2.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 72 to 65. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 46% and 65.8%.
MAI-Thinking-1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 71 versus 56.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
MiMo-V2.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.8 versus 46. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.