MAI-Thinking-1

MAI-Thinking-1 ranks #84 out of 227 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 53.1/100. Its evidence status is Estimated, and this profile shows 13 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.

MAI-Thinking-1 ranks #59 out of 187 eligible models for knowledge and understanding, with a public category score of 55.5/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

MAI-Thinking-1 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for coding and programming, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

MAI-Thinking-1 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

MAI-Thinking-1 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for reasoning and logic, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

MAI-Thinking-1 has source-displayable benchmark coverage for agentic tool use and computer tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

MAI-Thinking-1 ranks #3 out of 149 eligible models for instruction following, with a public category score of 94.7/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

No. MAI-Thinking-1 currently has 13 source-displayable rows. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

MAI-Thinking-1 has a reported context window of 256K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.