Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5 vs MiniMax M2.7
Head-to-head evidence from 6 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2.5 #62 (Estimated); MiniMax M2.7 #36 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. MiMo-V2.5 and MiniMax M2.7 share 6 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to MiMo-V2.5; 29 to MiniMax M2.7.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 6
- MiMo-V2.5 only
- 5
- MiniMax M2.7 only
- 29
- Comparable categories
- 2 / 8
Pick MiniMax M2.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5 only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 6 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
MiniMax M2.7 is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 64.11 to 58.62. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
MiMo-V2.5 is the reasoning model in the pair, while MiniMax M2.7 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. MiMo-V2.5 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for MiniMax M2.7.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | MiMo-V2.5 | Δ | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | MiMo-V2.565.8 | Margin← 8.8 | MiniMax M2.757.0 |
| Coding | MiMo-V2.556.1 | Margin← 2.8 | MiniMax M2.753.3 |
| Multimodal | MiMo-V2.579.0 | MarginNo overlap | MiniMax M2.7Not measured |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
Terminal-Bench 2.0
AgenticA 65.8%B 57%Winner: MiMo-V2.5Δ 8.8Terminal-Bench 2.0: MiMo-V2.5 scored 65.8%; MiniMax M2.7 scored 57%. MiMo-V2.5 wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SWE-bench Pro
CodingA 56.1%B 56.2%Winner: MiniMax M2.7Δ 0.1SWE-bench Pro: MiMo-V2.5 scored 56.1%; MiniMax M2.7 scored 56.2%. MiniMax M2.7 wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax M2.7 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | MiMo-V2.5Not available | MiniMax M2.7$0.3 input / $1.2 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | MiMo-V2.5Not available | MiniMax M2.745 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | MiMo-V2.5Not available | MiniMax M2.72.53 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | MiMo-V2.51M | MiniMax M2.7200K | MiMo-V2.5 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
AgenticMiMo-V2.5 wins12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax M2.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claw-EvalSource | 62.3% | 48.7% | MiMo-V2.5 leads |
| MM-ClawBenchSource | 23.8% | 62.7% | MiniMax M2.7 leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 65.8% | 57% | MiMo-V2.5 leads |
| Gert LabsSource | 46.89% | 40.40% | MiMo-V2.5 leads |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | 16.9% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 84.8% | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | — | 46.3% | Not comparable |
| MLE-Bench LiteSource | — | 66.6% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 25.6% | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | — | 10.6% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 32.9% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1158 | Not comparable |
CodingMiMo-V2.5 wins12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax M2.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench ProSource | 56.1% | 56.2% | MiniMax M2.7 leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 65.8% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench Verified*Source | — | 75.4% | Not comparable |
| SWE-RebenchSource | — | 51.9% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 76.5% | Not comparable |
| Multi-SWE BenchSource | — | 52.7% | Not comparable |
| VIBE-ProSource | — | 55.6% | Not comparable |
| NL2RepoSource | — | 39.8% | Not comparable |
| Vibe Code BenchSource | — | 27.04% | Not comparable |
| React Native EvalsSource | — | 71.4% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 52.6% | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | — | 47.0% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax M2.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA-DSource | — | 87.0% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-Pro (Arcee)Source | — | 80.8% | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 38.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 87.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 28.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | 0.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 26.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 34.4% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax M2.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME25 (Arcee)Source | — | 80.0% | Not comparable |
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax M2.7 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 75.7% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Which is better, MiMo-V2.5 or MiniMax M2.7?
MiniMax M2.7 is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 64.11 to 58.62. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 65.8% and 57%.
Which is better for coding, MiMo-V2.5 or MiniMax M2.7?
MiMo-V2.5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 56.1 versus 53.3. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for agentic tasks, MiMo-V2.5 or MiniMax M2.7?
MiMo-V2.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.8 versus 57. Inside this category, MM-ClawBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.