Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
MiMo-V2.5
70
Sakana Fugu Ultra
100
Pick Sakana Fugu Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+16.3 difference
Coding
+27.4 difference
MiMo-V2.5
Sakana Fugu Ultra
$null / $null
$5 / $30
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
1M
Pick Sakana Fugu Ultra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Sakana Fugu Ultra is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 100 to 70. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Sakana Fugu Ultra's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 83.5 against 56.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Pro, 56.1% to 73.7%.
Sakana Fugu Ultra is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 100 to 70. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 56.1% and 73.7%.
Sakana Fugu Ultra has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 83.5 versus 56.1. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Sakana Fugu Ultra has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.1 versus 65.8. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.