Skip to main content
Radar

Keep up with the models you depend on. Follow price changes, retirements, and API updates.Follow the models you depend on.

Follow model changes
BenchLM
NVIDIA logo
Model A
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

NVIDIA

40.6/100

Estimated · Public rank #183

90% interval 29.1–52.1

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B vs Seed 2.1 Pro

Updated September 10, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.

ByteDance logo
Model B
Seed 2.1 Pro

ByteDance

—

Evidence status unavailable

90% interval unavailable

Decision reading

At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.

1 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.

Share or export

Share on XLinkedInSocial cardCSVJSON

Which one for your work

Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.

No workload recommendation clears the current evidence threshold.

Use the matched evidence, workload costs, and sourced specifications below instead of treating a point score as a universal answer.

Show secondary and unsupported calls

  • Coding work

    Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks

    Not enough matched evidence

    Seed 2.1 Pro is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.

    Confidence: limited

  • Agentic work

    Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion

    Not enough matched evidence

    Seed 2.1 Pro is not ranked on the public lane for agentic, so no winner is named for agentic.

    Confidence: limited

  • Long documents

    Prompts that approach the documented context limit

    No clear pick

    The documented context windows are equal.

    Confidence: documented

  • Chat turn cost

    1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

  • Cache-heavy agent loop cost

    200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

  • Repository review cost

    50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

    Not enough matched evidence

    A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.

    Confidence: listed-rates

What is actually comparable

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.

Shared results
1
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
15
Seed 2.1 Pro only
10
Like-for-like categories
0 / 8

Category results, on a stated basis

Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.

Agentic

Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
44.3
Estimated · #90/152
Seed 2.1 Pro
Not ranked
Basis
BenchAlign lane · 2 vs 1 public rows
Reading
Not comparable

Coding

Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
40.2
Estimated · #116/151
Seed 2.1 Pro
Not ranked
Basis
BenchAlign lane · 2 vs 2 public rows
Reading
Not comparable

Reasoning

Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
48.3
Unranked · 2 rankable rows
Seed 2.1 Pro
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Knowledge

Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
38.7
Supported · #143/183
Seed 2.1 Pro
Not ranked
Basis
BenchAlign lane · 3 vs 1 public rows
Reading
Not comparable

Math

Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Not ranked
Seed 2.1 Pro
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multilingual

Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Not ranked
Seed 2.1 Pro
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Multimodal

Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
39.3
#42/48
Seed 2.1 Pro
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 1 vs 2 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Instruction following

Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
75.9
#59/123
Seed 2.1 Pro
Not ranked
Basis
Provisional lane · 1 vs 0 weighted rows
Reading
Not comparable

Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.

Shape of the matched evidence

Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.

Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.

Chat turn

1K fresh input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Seed 2.1 Pro
API rate not published
Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has no comparable published API token rate. Seed 2.1 Pro has no comparable published API token rate.

Repository review

50K fresh input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Seed 2.1 Pro
API rate not published
Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has no comparable published API token rate. Seed 2.1 Pro has no comparable published API token rate.

Cache-heavy agent loop

200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
Fits in one request
Cached-input rate unavailable
Seed 2.1 Pro
API rate not published
Fits in one request
Cached-input rate unavailable

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has no comparable published API token rate. Seed 2.1 Pro has no comparable published API token rate.

Specification differences

Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.

Context window

Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

256K

Seed 2.1 Pro

256K

Volcengine model pricing

Cached-input rate

A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

No comparable hosted API rate

Seed 2.1 Pro

No comparable hosted API rate

Volcengine model pricing

Documented inputs

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

Not sourced

Seed 2.1 Pro

Not sourced

Documented outputs

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

Not sourced

Seed 2.1 Pro

Not sourced

Provider availability

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

Not sourced

Seed 2.1 Pro

Not sourced

Reasoning profile

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

Reasoning

Seed 2.1 Pro

Reasoning

Weight access

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

Open Weight

Seed 2.1 Pro

Proprietary

License

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

Open Weight

Seed 2.1 Pro

Proprietary

Release date

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

2026-04-28

Seed 2.1 Pro

2026-06-24

If you already use one of these models
Deployment change
The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
Quality signal
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
Workload cost
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Context tradeoff
Both models list 256K.

Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.

Benchmark evidence

The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.

Browse raw public benchmark evidence26 rows

Agentic

  • OSWorld

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B47.4%
    Source
    Seed 2.1 Pro—

    Not directly comparable

  • τ²-bench results

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B45.3%
    Source
    Seed 2.1 Pro—

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—
    Seed 2.1 Pro71.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Coding

  • LiveCodeBench v5

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B63.2%
    Source
    Seed 2.1 Pro—

    Not directly comparable

  • SciCode

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B32%
    Source
    Seed 2.1 Pro—

    Not directly comparable

  • Terminal-Bench 2.1

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—
    Seed 2.1 Pro71.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • NL2Repo

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—
    Seed 2.1 Pro47%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Knowledge

  • MMLU-Pro

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B77.3%
    Source
    Seed 2.1 Pro—

    Not directly comparable

  • GPQA

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B72.2%
    Source
    Seed 2.1 Pro—

    Not directly comparable

  • GPQA-D

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B72.2%
    Source
    Seed 2.1 Pro—

    Not directly comparable

  • SuperGPQA

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—
    Seed 2.1 Pro70.8%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Math

  • AIME 2025

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B82.1%
    Source
    Seed 2.1 Pro—

    Not directly comparable

Multimodal

  • MMMU

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B70.8%
    Source
    Seed 2.1 Pro—

    Not directly comparable

  • MMLongBench-Doc

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B57.5%
    Source
    Seed 2.1 Pro—

    Not directly comparable

  • CharXiv

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3%
    Source
    Seed 2.1 Pro85.4%
    Source

    Seed 2.1 Pro leads this result

  • ScreenSpot Pro

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B57.8%
    Source
    Seed 2.1 Pro—

    Not directly comparable

  • Video-MME (w/o subtitle)

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B72.2%
    Source
    Seed 2.1 Pro—

    Not directly comparable

  • AI2D_TEST

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B88.5%
    Source
    Seed 2.1 Pro—

    Not directly comparable

  • RefCOCO (avg)

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B90.5%
    Source
    Seed 2.1 Pro—

    Not directly comparable

  • MathVision

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—
    Seed 2.1 Pro92.6%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • MMMU-Pro

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—
    Seed 2.1 Pro81.6%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • ZeroBench

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—
    Seed 2.1 Pro18.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • BabyVision

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—
    Seed 2.1 Pro73.7%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • ERQA

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—
    Seed 2.1 Pro72.0%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

  • Video-MME

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B—
    Seed 2.1 Pro89.2%
    Source

    Not directly comparable

Instruction following

  • IFBench

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B74.2%
    Source
    Seed 2.1 Pro—

    Not directly comparable

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Seed 2.1 Pro?

At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.

Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Seed 2.1 Pro?

Seed 2.1 Pro is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Seed 2.1 Pro?

Seed 2.1 Pro is not ranked on the public lane for agentic tasks, so no winner is named for agentic tasks.

Which costs less, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Seed 2.1 Pro?

Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.

Which has the larger context window, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Seed 2.1 Pro?

Both models list the same context window, 256K.

Related comparisons

Compare API pricing Read the methodology Open the model selector

Last updated September 10, 2026

Watch Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B vs Seed 2.1 Pro

One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.