Agentic
Not comparable- Seed 2.1 Pro
- Not ranked
- Seed 2.1 Turbo
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 1 vs 1 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Seed 2.1 Pro vs Seed 2.1 Turbo
Updated September 10, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload. This is a same-family comparison, so migration details appear when the source data supports them.
Decision reading
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
11 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Share or export
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
No workload recommendation clears the current evidence threshold.
Use the matched evidence, workload costs, and sourced specifications below instead of treating a point score as a universal answer.
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
Seed 2.1 Pro and Seed 2.1 Turbo are not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Confidence: limited
Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
Seed 2.1 Pro and Seed 2.1 Turbo are not ranked on the public lane for agentic, so no winner is named for agentic.
Confidence: limited
Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
No clear pick
The documented context windows are equal.
Confidence: documented
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Cache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
11 Shared
- Shared results
- 11
- Seed 2.1 Pro only
- 0
- Seed 2.1 Turbo only
- 0
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 / 8
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.
Coding
Not comparable- Seed 2.1 Pro
- Not ranked
- Seed 2.1 Turbo
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 2 vs 2 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Reasoning
Not comparable- Seed 2.1 Pro
- Not ranked
- Seed 2.1 Turbo
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Knowledge
Not comparable- Seed 2.1 Pro
- Not ranked
- Seed 2.1 Turbo
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 1 vs 1 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- Seed 2.1 Pro
- Not ranked
- Seed 2.1 Turbo
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- Seed 2.1 Pro
- Not ranked
- Seed 2.1 Turbo
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multimodal
Not comparable- Seed 2.1 Pro
- Not ranked
- Seed 2.1 Turbo
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 2 vs 2 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Instruction following
Not comparable- Seed 2.1 Pro
- Not ranked
- Seed 2.1 Turbo
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | Seed 2.1 Pro | Seed 2.1 Turbo | Basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign lane · 1 vs 1 public rows | Not comparable |
| Coding | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign lane · 2 vs 2 public rows | Not comparable |
| Reasoning | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Knowledge | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign lane · 1 vs 1 public rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 2 vs 2 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.
SuperGPQA
Knowledge
CharXiv
Multimodal
MMMU-Pro
Multimodal
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- Seed 2.1 Pro
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
- Seed 2.1 Turbo
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
Seed 2.1 Pro has no comparable published API token rate. Seed 2.1 Turbo has no comparable published API token rate.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- Seed 2.1 Pro
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
- Seed 2.1 Turbo
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
Seed 2.1 Pro has no comparable published API token rate. Seed 2.1 Turbo has no comparable published API token rate.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- Seed 2.1 Pro
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
- Seed 2.1 Turbo
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
Seed 2.1 Pro has no comparable published API token rate. Seed 2.1 Turbo has no comparable published API token rate.
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationSeed 2.1 ProSeed 2.1 Turbo
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Seed 2.1 Pro
Seed 2.1 Turbo
API model ID
Seed 2.1 Pro
doubao-seed-2-1-pro-260628
Volcengine model pricingSeed 2.1 Turbo
doubao-seed-2-1-turbo-260628
Volcengine model pricingCached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Seed 2.1 Pro
No comparable hosted API rate
Volcengine model pricingSeed 2.1 Turbo
No comparable hosted API rate
Volcengine model pricingDocumented inputs
Seed 2.1 Pro
Not sourced
Seed 2.1 Turbo
Not sourced
Documented outputs
Seed 2.1 Pro
Not sourced
Seed 2.1 Turbo
Not sourced
Provider availability
Seed 2.1 Pro
Not sourced
Seed 2.1 Turbo
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
Seed 2.1 Pro
Reasoning
Seed 2.1 Turbo
Reasoning
Weight access
Seed 2.1 Pro
Proprietary
Seed 2.1 Turbo
Proprietary
License
Seed 2.1 Pro
Proprietary
Seed 2.1 Turbo
Proprietary
Release date
Seed 2.1 Pro
2026-06-24
Seed 2.1 Turbo
2026-06-24
If you are choosing between sibling variants
- Deployment change
- Both entries list ByteDance as the provider. Confirm endpoint, model ID, limits, and feature support before switching.
- Quality signal
- At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
- Workload cost
- A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
- Context tradeoff
- Both models list 256K.
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence11 rows
Agentic
Terminal-Bench 2.1
Shared sourceSeed 2.1 Pro71.0%Seed 2.1 Turbo67.6%Seed 2.1 Pro leads this result
Coding
Terminal-Bench 2.1
Shared sourceSeed 2.1 Pro71.0%Seed 2.1 Turbo67.6%Seed 2.1 Pro leads this result
NL2Repo
Shared sourceSeed 2.1 Pro47%Seed 2.1 Turbo43.7%Seed 2.1 Pro leads this result
Knowledge
SuperGPQA
Shared sourceSeed 2.1 Pro70.8%Seed 2.1 Turbo67.4%Seed 2.1 Pro leads this result
Multimodal
MathVision
Shared sourceSeed 2.1 Pro92.6%Seed 2.1 Turbo90.1%Seed 2.1 Pro leads this result
MMMU-Pro
Shared sourceSeed 2.1 Pro81.6%Seed 2.1 Turbo80.1%Seed 2.1 Pro leads this result
ZeroBench
Shared sourceSeed 2.1 Pro18.0%Seed 2.1 Turbo11.0%Seed 2.1 Pro leads this result
BabyVision
Shared sourceSeed 2.1 Pro73.7%Seed 2.1 Turbo62.9%Seed 2.1 Pro leads this result
CharXiv
Shared sourceSeed 2.1 Pro85.4%Seed 2.1 Turbo82.5%Seed 2.1 Pro leads this result
ERQA
Shared sourceSeed 2.1 Pro72.0%Seed 2.1 Turbo71.3%Seed 2.1 Pro leads this result
Video-MME
Shared sourceSeed 2.1 Pro89.2%Seed 2.1 Turbo89.0%Seed 2.1 Pro leads this result
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Seed 2.1 Pro or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.
Which is better for coding, Seed 2.1 Pro or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Seed 2.1 Pro and Seed 2.1 Turbo are not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Seed 2.1 Pro or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Seed 2.1 Pro and Seed 2.1 Turbo are not ranked on the public lane for agentic tasks, so no winner is named for agentic tasks.
Which costs less, Seed 2.1 Pro or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.
Which has the larger context window, Seed 2.1 Pro or Seed 2.1 Turbo?
Both models list the same context window, 256K.
Related comparisons
Last updated September 10, 2026
Watch Seed 2.1 Pro vs Seed 2.1 Turbo
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.