Skip to main content

o1 vs Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

o1

59

VS

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

72

1 categoriesvs0 categories

Pick Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Knowledge

o1
75.7vs73.9

+1.8 difference

Operational Comparison

o1

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

Price (per 1M tokens)

$15 / $60

N/A

Speed

98 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

32.29s

N/A

Context Window

200K

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 72 to 59. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for o1.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, o1 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 72 to 59.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, o1 or Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)?

o1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 75.7 versus 73.9. Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.