Head-to-head comparison across 1 benchmark categories
Claude Mythos Preview
84
o1
64
Pick Claude Mythos Preview if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Knowledge
+0.8 difference
Claude Mythos Preview
o1
$25 / $125
$15 / $60
N/A
98 t/s
N/A
32.29s
1M
200K
Pick Claude Mythos Preview if you want the stronger benchmark profile. o1 only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Claude Mythos Preview is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 84 to 64. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Claude Mythos Preview is also the more expensive model on tokens at $25.00 input / $125.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $15.00 input / $60.00 output per 1M tokens for o1. That is roughly 2.1x on output cost alone. Claude Mythos Preview gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for o1.
Claude Mythos Preview is ahead overall, 84 to 64. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 94.5% and 75.7%.
o1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 75.7 versus 74.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.