Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 4.1 Opus vs Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
45.88/100
Margin
12.1pts
winning →
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus #142 (Supported); Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) #66 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus and Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to Claude 4.1 Opus; 2 to Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning).

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
0
Claude 4.1 Opus only
4
Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) only
2
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus and Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude 4.1 Opus is priced at $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning). Claude 4.1 Opus has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning).

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 4.1 OpusQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 4.1 Opus$15 input / $75 outputQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)$0 input / $0 outputQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 4.1 Opus29 tok/sQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 4.1 Opus1.66 sQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 4.1 Opus200KQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)128KClaude 4.1 Opus lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Result
JobBenchSource 21.9%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 74.5%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 28.2%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 8.481%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 OpusQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1207Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus and Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus and Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) today?

Claude 4.1 Opus: $15.00 input / $75.00 output per 1M tokens Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning): $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.