Skip to main content
Radar

Five or fewer confirmed AI changes, with original sources, on mornings when something changed.A free source-linked morning brief.

See the free Radar Brief

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

EstablishedReleased Jul 1, 2025Open WeightReasoning128K context

Released Jul 1, 2025 see all recent releases

Decision reading
Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) scores 59 out of 100 and ranks #86 of 230. This profile shows 2 source-displayable benchmark rows. Published weights can be self-hosted, but infrastructure cost varies and is not a comparable API token rate.

Data as of September 2, 2026 · How the score is built

Strongest published evidence

Published rows are visible, but no category has enough eligible evidence for a comparative rank.

Validate before choosing

2 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.

Decision snapshot

Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.

Capability

59/100

field median 59.1

#86 of 230 ranked models

Price

Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies

input median $1

No comparable first-party hosted token rate

Speed

Not measured

field median 90 tok/s

Time to first token not measured

Context

128Ktokens

field median 256,000

Reported for this model; direct source link not stored

How much of this is verified

Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.

  1. AgenticNot measured
  2. CodingNot measured
  3. ReasoningNot measured
  4. KnowledgeNot measured
  5. Math2/2 verified
  6. MultilingualNot measured
  7. MultimodalNot measured
  8. Inst. FollowingNot measured
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured

Spec sheet

Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.

API model ID
Not published
Context window
128K
Maximum output
Not sourced yet
Knowledge cutoff
Not sourced yet
Input modalities
Not sourced yet
Output modalities
Not sourced yet
Parameters
Not sourced yet
Availability
Not sourced yet
Cloud regions
Not tracked yet
Lifecycle
Established
API capabilities
Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
Prompt caching
Not documented in the pricing record
Self-host
Open weights available; hardware estimate not sourced
Rate limits
Not tracked yet

Deployment options

Self-host and provider-specific paths stay separate from benchmark evidence so operating constraints are visible before a score becomes the whole decision.

Published weights are available, but BenchLM does not yet have a sourced parameter and VRAM profile for this exact model. Hardware cost estimates stay unavailable until that sizing record is complete.

Estimate VRAM from known parameters

Category score record

Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticWeight 22%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
CodingWeight 20%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MathRank Not rankedWeight 5%2 benchmarksVerified30.2
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured

Benchmark ledger

Math opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.

Math2 rows
Math benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)FrontierMath v2 Tiers 1-3Score8.481%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 89.000%

Gap80.5 behindWeightWeighted 30%
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)FrontierMath v2 Tier 4Score0.000%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 83.000%

Gap83 behindWeightWeighted 10%

Lineage

The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. A successor's displayed score stays at least 0.1 points above its predecessor; raw benchmark rows do not move. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.

  1. Jul 1, 2025 · you are here

    Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

    Score 59.0 · Price not listed

reasoning · 2507

How to read this profile

The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) ranks #86 of 230 on the public leaderboard with a score of 59.01/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for a verified position.

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) is a open weight model with a 128K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) sits in the Qwen3 235B 2507 family with Qwen3 235B 2507. 2 of 416 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.

Frequently asked questions

How does Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) ranks #86 out of 230 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 59.01/100. Its evidence status is Estimated, and this profile shows 2 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.

Is Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) good for mathematics?

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) open source?

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) is an open-weight model from Alibaba. Its weights can be downloaded for local or hosted deployment, subject to the published license. Open weight does not automatically mean open source: training data and training code may remain private, and commercial restrictions can still apply.

Which sibling models are related to Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) belongs to the Qwen3 235B 2507 family. Related tracked variants include Qwen3 235B 2507. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.

Does Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

No. Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) currently has 2 source-displayable rows across 416 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

What is the context window size of Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) has a reported context window of 128K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.

Compare Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) with every tracked model409 comparisons

Last updated September 2, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.

Watch Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) in the weekly brief

Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.