Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs o1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 4 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

21.08/100
Margin
26.1pts
winning →
OpenAI
47.14/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 1.0 Pro #203 (Supported); o1 #136 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 1.0 Pro and o1 share 4 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Gemini 1.0 Pro; 12 to o1.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
4
Gemini 1.0 Pro only
0
o1 only
12
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Gemini 1.0 Pro and o1 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 4 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

o1 has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 32K for Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 1.0 Pro and o1
CategoryGemini 1.0 ProΔo1
KnowledgeGemini 1.0 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapo175.7
MathGemini 1.0 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapo19.3
Inst. FollowingGemini 1.0 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapo192.2

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 1.0 Proo1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 1.0 ProNot availableo1$15 input / $60 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 1.0 ProNot availableo198 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 1.0 ProNot availableo132.29 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 1.0 Pro32Ko1200Ko1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Proo1Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 62.6%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Proo1Result
AA-SciCodeSource 11.7%35.8%o1 leads
AA Coding IndexSource 39.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Proo1Result
AA-LCRSource 59.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Proo1Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 3.1%23.4%o1 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 27.7%74.7%o1 leads
AA-HLESource 4.6%7.7%o1 leads
MMLUSource 91.8%Not comparable
GPQASource 75.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -10.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 34.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 69.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Proo1Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 9.310%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 Proo1Result
IFEvalSource 92.2%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 70.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Gemini 1.0 Pro and o1 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Gemini 1.0 Pro and o1 today?

Gemini 1.0 Pro: Pricing unavailable o1: $15.00 input / $60.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026