Skip to main content

React Native Evals

An open benchmark for AI coding agents on real-world React Native implementation tasks, emphasizing working app behavior, recommended architecture choices, and strict constraint adherence.

How BenchLM shows React Native Evals right now

BenchLM is tracking React Native Evals in the local dataset, but exact-source verification records for these rows are still being attached. To avoid a blank benchmark page, BenchLM shows the current tracked rows below as a display-only reference table.

These tracked rows are useful for inspection and spot-checking, but until exact-source attachments are completed they should not be treated as fully verified public benchmark rows.

14 tracked modelsLocal tracked rowsAwaiting exact-source attachmentsDisplay only

Tracked score on React Native Evals — April 10, 2026

BenchLM mirrors the published tracked score view for React Native Evals. Composer 2 leads the public snapshot at 96.2% , followed by Claude Opus 4.6 (84.4%) and GPT-5.4 (82.6%). BenchLM does not use these results to rank models overall.

14 modelsCodingCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated April 10, 2026

The published React Native Evals snapshot is tightly clustered at the top: Composer 2 sits at 96.2%, while the third row is only 13.6 points behind. The broader top-10 spread is 27.2 points, so the benchmark still separates strong models even when the leaders cluster.

14 models have been evaluated on React Native Evals. The benchmark falls in the Coding category. This category carries a 20% weight in BenchLM.ai's overall scoring system. React Native Evals is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About React Native Evals

Year

2026

Tasks

React Native app implementation tasks

Format

Framework-specific app development evaluation

Difficulty

Production mobile app engineering

React Native Evals focuses on framework-specific mobile work that generic coding benchmarks often miss. The public dashboard groups tasks into areas like navigation, animation, and async state, with repeated runs and cost tracking across models.

BenchLM freshness & provenance

Version

React Native Evals 2026

Refresh cadence

Quarterly

Staleness state

Current

Question availability

Public benchmark set

CurrentDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Tracked score table (14 models)

1
Composer 2composer-2
96.2%
2
Claude Opus 4.6claude-opus-4-6
84.4%
3
GPT-5.4gpt-5-4
82.6%
4
GPT-5.3 Codexgpt-5-3-codex
80.9%
5
Gemini 3.1 Progemini-3-1-pro
78.9%
6
Claude Sonnet 4.6claude-sonnet-4-6
77.9%
7
Kimi K2.5kimi-k2-5
74.9%
8
GLM-5glm-5
74.2%
9
Grok 4grok-4
70.1%
10
DeepSeek V3.2deepseek-v3-2
69%
11
GPT-OSS 120Bgpt-oss-120b
66.4%
12
GPT-OSS 20Bgpt-oss-20b
64.3%
13
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instructqwen2-5-coder-32b-instruct
42.7%
14
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32Bdeepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b
31.8%

FAQ

What does React Native Evals measure?

An open benchmark for AI coding agents on real-world React Native implementation tasks, emphasizing working app behavior, recommended architecture choices, and strict constraint adherence.

Which model leads the published React Native Evals snapshot?

Composer 2 currently leads the published React Native Evals snapshot with a tracked score of 96.2%. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.

How many models are evaluated on React Native Evals?

14 AI models are included in BenchLM's mirrored React Native Evals snapshot, based on the public leaderboard captured on April 10, 2026.

Last updated: April 10, 2026 · mirrored from the public benchmark leaderboard

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.