Capability
49.4/100
field median 59.1
#145 of 230 ranked models
Five or fewer confirmed AI changes, with original sources, on mornings when something changed.A free source-linked morning brief.
See the free Radar BriefReleased Aug 5, 2025 — see all recent releases
Data as of September 2, 2026 · How the score is built
Agentic ranks #92. Particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
2 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Capability
49.4/100
field median 59.1
#145 of 230 ranked models
Price
Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
input median $1
No comparable first-party hosted token rate
Speed
162tok/s
field median 90 tok/s
First token 13.21 s
Context
128Ktokens
field median 256,000
Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.
GPT-OSS 120B category percentile values
The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
Self-host and provider-specific paths stay separate from benchmark evidence so operating constraints are visible before a score becomes the whole decision.
Published weights are available, but BenchLM does not yet have a sourced parameter and VRAM profile for this exact model. Hardware cost estimates stay unavailable until that sizing record is complete.
Estimate VRAM from known parametersScores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #92 of 143Percentile 36thWeight 22%1 benchmarkVerified | 44.6 | #92 of 143 | 36th | 22% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| CodingRank #103 of 148Percentile 31stWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerified | 47.5 | #103 of 148 | 31st | 20% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| React Native Evals | Score71.6% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Composer 2 · 96.1% | Gap24.5 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gert LabsGert Labs Composite Game Benchmark | Score29.61% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 4.8 · 72.97% | Gap43.4 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. A successor's displayed score stays at least 0.1 points above its predecessor; raw benchmark rows do not move. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Aug 5, 2025 · you are here
GPT-OSS 120BScore 49.4 · Price not listed
Base entry
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
GPT-OSS 120B ranks #145 of 230 on the public leaderboard with a score of 49.37/100. Its source-verified position is #66 of 105.
GPT-OSS 120B is a open weight model with a 128K context window. No explicit reasoning mode is documented in this profile.
GPT-OSS 120B sits in the GPT-OSS family with GPT-OSS 20B. 2 of 416 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Agentic at #92, while its lowest eligible position is Coding at #103. particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
GPT-OSS 120B ranks #145 out of 230 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 49.37/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 2 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.
GPT-OSS 120B ranks #103 out of 148 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 47.5/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
GPT-OSS 120B ranks #92 out of 143 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 44.6/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
GPT-OSS 120B is an open-weight model from OpenAI. Its weights can be downloaded for local or hosted deployment, subject to the published license. Open weight does not automatically mean open source: training data and training code may remain private, and commercial restrictions can still apply.
GPT-OSS 120B belongs to the GPT-OSS family. Related tracked variants include GPT-OSS 20B. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.
No. GPT-OSS 120B currently has 27 source-displayable rows across 416 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
GPT-OSS 120B has a reported context window of 128K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.
Related resources
Last updated September 2, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.