Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Cohere Embed 5 launch: Page-image finance average

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Cohere launch retrieval report.

Evaluation results published by Cohere.

nDCG@10 on Cohere Embed 5 launch: Page-image finance average — September 30, 2026 launch; October 1 capture

We mirror the published ndcg@10 view for Cohere Embed 5 launch: Page-image finance average. Cohere Embed 5 Pro leads the public snapshot at 77.0, followed by Cohere Embed 5 Fast (73.2) and Cohere Embed 4 (71.1). We do not use these results to rank models overall.

5 configurationsCross-domainDated provider configurationsDisplay onlyUpdated September 30, 2026 launch; October 1 capture

nDCG@10 table (5 configurations)

nDCG@10 results for Cohere Embed 5 launch: Page-image finance average
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1Cohere Embed 5 ProCohereCohere provider report; evaluated snapshot and hardware undisclosed
77.0
Not reportedUnknown
2Cohere Embed 5 FastCohereCohere provider report; evaluated snapshot and hardware undisclosed
73.2
Not reportedUnknown
3Cohere Embed 4CohereCohere provider report; evaluated snapshot and hardware undisclosed
71.1
Not reportedUnknown
4Voyage Multimodal 3.5Voyage AICohere provider report; evaluated snapshot and hardware undisclosed
70.1
Not reportedUnknown
5Gemini Embedding 2GoogleCohere provider report; evaluated snapshot and hardware undisclosed
56.7
Not reportedUnknown

How to read this provider report

Five financial datasets with text queries and page-image-only corpus inputs. This average is separate from text and fused retrieval.

Cohere reports these results in its Embed 5 launch. The linked full spreadsheet requires sign-in at capture, so this view includes only exact figures available in the public post. Model snapshots, evaluation dates, and uncertainty intervals are undisclosed.

Each input representation and metric retains its own cohort. RCP-nDCG@10 evaluates reordering a fixed candidate set; it does not measure first-stage retrieval. These provider comparisons do not enter weighted model rankings.

The published Cohere Embed 5 launch: Page-image finance average snapshot places Cohere Embed 5 Pro first at 77.0. The third row is 5.9 score units behind. The broader top-10 range is 20.3 score units, so the table still separates the published systems.

5 configurations are shown for Cohere Embed 5 launch: Page-image finance average. The benchmark falls in the Cross-domain category. We keep external benchmark mirrors separate from the weighted global scoring system, so these results remain source-specific evidence. Cohere Embed 5 launch: Page-image finance average is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About Cohere Embed 5 launch: Page-image finance average

Year

2026

Freshness and provenance

Version

Cohere Embed 5 launch provider report

Refresh cadence

Reviewed dated source capture

Staleness state

Dated provider configurations

Question availability

Upstream datasets and terms; aggregate results only

Dated provider configurationsDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does Cohere Embed 5 launch: Page-image finance average measure?

Cohere launch retrieval report.

Which model leads the published Cohere Embed 5 launch: Page-image finance average snapshot?

Cohere Embed 5 Pro currently leads the published Cohere Embed 5 launch: Page-image finance average snapshot with 77.0 ndcg@10. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.

How many models are evaluated on Cohere Embed 5 launch: Page-image finance average?

The September 30, 2026 launch; October 1 capture snapshot contains 5 AI models.

Last updated: September 30, 2026 launch; October 1 capture · mirrored from the public benchmark leaderboard

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,600+ readers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.