FACTS Parametric
We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.
A parametric factuality benchmark reported in DeepSeek-V4 base-model evaluations.
Benchmark score on FACTS Parametric — October 29, 2026
We compile the FACTS Parametric rows from provider self-reports. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base leads the table at 62.6%, followed by DeepSeek V4 Flash Base (33.9%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base
DeepSeek
2 modelsKnowledgeCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated October 29, 2026
Benchmark score table (2 models)
| Rank | Model / configuration | Score | Parameters (B) | Open / closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeepSeek V4 Pro BaseDeepSeek | 62.6% | Not reported | Open |
| 2 | DeepSeek V4 Flash BaseDeepSeek | 33.9% | Not reported | Open |
About FACTS Parametric
Year
2026
Tasks
Parametric factual recall
Format
Exact match
Difficulty
Factual accuracy focused
BenchLM stores FACTS Parametric as a display-only provider-table row when exact values are published in DeepSeek-V4 evaluations.
Freshness and provenance
Version
FACTS Parametric 2026
Refresh cadence
Quarterly
Staleness state
Current
Question availability
Public benchmark set
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
Questions
What does FACTS Parametric measure?
A parametric factuality benchmark reported in DeepSeek-V4 base-model evaluations.
Which model scores highest on FACTS Parametric?
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base by DeepSeek currently leads with a score of 62.6% on FACTS Parametric.
How many models are evaluated on FACTS Parametric?
2 AI models have published results on FACTS Parametric in the BenchLM catalog.
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
Read a sample issueJoin 6,100+ subscribers.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.