Benchmark profile
FACTS Parametric
A parametric factuality benchmark reported in DeepSeek-V4 base-model evaluations.
Data verifiedBenchmark score on FACTS Parametric — July 29, 2026
BenchLM mirrors the published score view for FACTS Parametric. DeepSeek V4 Pro Base leads the public snapshot at 62.6% , followed by DeepSeek V4 Flash Base (33.9%). BenchLM does not use these results to rank models overall.
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base
DeepSeek
deepseek-v4-pro-base
DeepSeek V4 Flash Base
DeepSeek
deepseek-v4-flash-base
Benchmark score table (2 models)
ScoreAbout FACTS Parametric
Year
2026
Tasks
Parametric factual recall
Format
Exact match
Difficulty
Factual accuracy focused
BenchLM stores FACTS Parametric as a display-only provider-table row when exact values are published in DeepSeek-V4 evaluations.
BenchLM freshness & provenance
Version
FACTS Parametric 2026
Refresh cadence
Quarterly
Staleness state
Current
Question availability
Public benchmark set
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
FAQ
What does FACTS Parametric measure?
A parametric factuality benchmark reported in DeepSeek-V4 base-model evaluations.
Which model scores highest on FACTS Parametric?
DeepSeek V4 Pro Base by DeepSeek currently leads with a score of 62.6% on FACTS Parametric.
How many models are evaluated on FACTS Parametric?
2 AI models have been evaluated on FACTS Parametric on BenchLM.
Compare Top Models on FACTS Parametric
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.