Global MMLU Lite (Kaggle)
We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.
Kaggle reports an average across 16 language dimensions of Global MMLU Lite, with separate culturally sensitive and culturally agnostic results.
Evaluation results published by Cohere Labs. How Kaggle Benchmarks reruns tests.
Kaggle average on Global MMLU Lite (Kaggle) v1 — Source retrieved 2026-10-20T15:19:04.746Z
We mirror the published kaggle average view for Global MMLU Lite (Kaggle) v1. Claude Opus 5 has the highest reported value at 95.7%. These are published source configurations. Compare the task version and disclosed settings before treating a score difference as a model difference. We do not use these results to rank models overall.
45 modelsMultilingualCurrentDisplay onlyUpdated Source retrieved 2026-10-20T15:19:04.746Z
Kaggle average table (45 models)
| Rank | Model / configuration | Score | Parameters (B) | Open / closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5Creator not reported | 95.7% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 2 | Gemini 3.5 FlashCreator not reported | 95.4% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 3 | Gemini 4 ArgonCreator not reported | 95.4% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 4 | Claude Opus 5.5Creator not reported | 95.4% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 5 | Gemini 3.8 FlashCreator not reported | 95.3% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 6 | Gemini 3.7 FlashCreator not reported | 94.9% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4.8Creator not reported | 94.9% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 8 | Gemini 3 Pro PreviewCreator not reported | 94.5% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 9 | Claude Opus 4.1Creator not reported | 94.3% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 10 | Gemini 3.6 FlashCreator not reported | 94.3% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 11 | GPT-5.6 SolCreator not reported | 94.1% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 12 | GPT-6 SolCreator not reported | 94.1% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 13 | Grok 4.5Creator not reported | 93.3% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 14 | Gemini 2.5 ProCreator not reported | 93.2% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 15 | GPT-5.6 TerraCreator not reported | 92.7% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 16 | Claude Sonnet 5.5Creator not reported | 92.6% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 17 | GPT-6 AstraCreator not reported | 92.6% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 18 | GPT-6 LunaCreator not reported | 92.0% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 19 | Gemini 2.5 FlashCreator not reported | 91.5% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 20 | Gemini 2.5 Flash PreviewCreator not reported | 90.9% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 21 | Gemma 4 31BCreator not reported | 90.7% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 22 | Claude Sonnet 4Creator not reported | 90.6% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 23 | Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteCreator not reported | 89.5% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 24 | GPT-5Creator not reported | 89.0% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 25 | Grok 4Creator not reported | 88.8% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 26 | Qwen 3 235B A22B Instruct 2506Creator not reported | 88.0% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 27 | GPT-4.1Creator not reported | 87.5% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 28 | Claude Haiku 5.5Creator not reported | 87.3% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 29 | o4 miniCreator not reported | 87.0% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 30 | Gemma 4 26B A4BCreator not reported | 85.7% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 31 | Command A Creator not reported | 83.9% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 32 | GPT-5.6 LunaCreator not reported | 83.1% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 33 | Claude 3.7 SonnetCreator not reported | 80.8% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 34 | deepseek-v3.1Creator not reported | 80.4% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 35 | GPT-6.1 SolCreator not reported | 78.9% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 36 | Mistral Small 3.1Creator not reported | 78.5% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 37 | o3 miniCreator not reported | 78.0% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 38 | Gemma 3 27BCreator not reported | 76.3% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 39 | Granite 4.0 SmallCreator not reported | 75.0% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 40 | Aya Expanse 32BCreator not reported | 73.5% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 41 | DeepSeek-R1Creator not reported | 67.4% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 42 | Grok 3 MiniCreator not reported | 67.3% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 43 | Gemma 3 4BCreator not reported | 65.1% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 44 | Claude 3.5 HaikuCreator not reported | 61.1% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 45 | Mistral Medium 3Creator not reported | 55.1% | Not reported | Unknown |
How to read this leaderboard
Compare multilingual multiple-choice knowledge within the Kaggle protocol. Read the culturally sensitive and culturally agnostic scores beside the average; the dataset language count is not the denominator of this leaderboard average.
Operator receipt: 45 sourced rows are currently displayable on this page; the leading published row is Claude Opus 5 at 95.7%.
Honest limit: This Kaggle protocol is separate from Artificial Analysis Global-MMLU-Lite and the full Global-MMLU dataset. The source response includes task version 1 for Average and task version 2 for language and cultural-sensitivity metrics. Unspecified model settings remain unknown. These results do not enter weighted rankings.
How we show Global MMLU Lite (Kaggle)
The source dataset has 400 questions per language, split evenly between culturally sensitive and culturally agnostic samples, using human translations or post-edits. Its current dataset card covers 23 languages; this Kaggle v1 board instead labels its published Average as an average of 16 language dimensions. We preserve that published average and the individual source metrics without recomputing a broader score.
This Kaggle protocol is separate from Artificial Analysis Global-MMLU-Lite and the full Global-MMLU dataset. The source response includes task version 1 for Average and task version 2 for language and cultural-sensitivity metrics. Unspecified model settings remain unknown. These results do not enter weighted rankings.
Snapshot
These are published source configurations. Compare the task version and disclosed settings before treating a score difference as a model difference. The table retains each source configuration and its reported value.
45 models are shown for Global MMLU Lite (Kaggle). The benchmark falls in the Multilingual category. We keep external benchmark mirrors separate from the weighted global scoring system, so these results remain source-specific evidence. Global MMLU Lite (Kaggle) is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.
About Global MMLU Lite (Kaggle)
Year
2026
Tasks
400 test questions per language; source average of 16 language dimensions
Format
Source-published percentage score
Difficulty
Multilingual multiple-choice knowledge
The source dataset has 400 questions per language, split evenly between culturally sensitive and culturally agnostic samples, using human translations or post-edits. Its current dataset card covers 23 languages; this Kaggle v1 board instead labels its published Average as an average of 16 language dimensions. We preserve that published average and the individual source metrics without recomputing a broader score.
Freshness and provenance
Version
Global MMLU Lite (Kaggle) 2026
Refresh cadence
Quarterly
Staleness state
Current
Question availability
Public benchmark set
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
Questions
What does Global MMLU Lite (Kaggle) measure?
Kaggle reports an average across 16 language dimensions of Global MMLU Lite, with separate culturally sensitive and culturally agnostic results.
Which source row has the highest reported Global MMLU Lite (Kaggle) value?
Claude Opus 5 has the highest reported Global MMLU Lite (Kaggle) value at 95.7%. These are published source configurations. Compare the task version and disclosed settings before treating a score difference as a model difference. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.
How many models are evaluated on Global MMLU Lite (Kaggle)?
The Source retrieved 2026-10-20T15:19:04.746Z snapshot contains 45 AI models.
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
Read a sample issueJoin 6,100+ subscribers.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.