A February 2026 HMMT slice used in newer frontier-model math comparisons.
BenchLM mirrors the published score view for HMMT Feb 2026. Qwen3.5 397B leads the public snapshot at 87.9% , followed by Qwen3.6 Plus (87.8%) and Kimi K2.5 (87.1%). BenchLM does not use these results to rank models overall.
Qwen3.5 397B
Alibaba
Qwen3.6 Plus
Alibaba
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI
The published HMMT Feb 2026 snapshot is tightly clustered at the top: Qwen3.5 397B sits at 87.9%, while the third row is only 0.8 points behind. The broader top-10 spread is 5.3 points, so many of the published scores sit in a relatively narrow band.
6 models have been evaluated on HMMT Feb 2026. The benchmark falls in the Math category. This category carries a 5% weight in BenchLM.ai's overall scoring system. HMMT Feb 2026 is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.
Year
2026
Tasks
Competition math problems
Format
Contest mathematics
Difficulty
Olympiad-style mathematics
HMMT February 2026 matters because small score deltas at the frontier often depend on which contest set is used. BenchLM keeps this newer slice distinct from older HMMT summary rows.
Version
HMMT Feb 2026 2026
Refresh cadence
Quarterly
Staleness state
Current
Question availability
Public benchmark set
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
A February 2026 HMMT slice used in newer frontier-model math comparisons.
Qwen3.5 397B by Alibaba currently leads with a score of 87.9% on HMMT Feb 2026.
6 AI models have been evaluated on HMMT Feb 2026 on BenchLM.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.