GDPval — Mercor evaluation (GDPval (Mercor))
We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.
Producing workplace deliverables from reference files. This table shows Mercor-run configurations for reference and is excluded from model rankings.
Evaluation results published by Mercor. Published evaluation aggregates only; task contents and dataset license grants are not included.
Mean Score on GDPval (Mercor) — October 15, 2026 capture
We mirror the published mean score view for GDPval (Mercor). Opus 5.5 leads the public snapshot at 88.30%, followed by DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (86.70%) and GPT-6 Astra (86.70%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.
Opus 5.5
Anthropic
Stirrup · max reasoning
Published margin ±1.5 · 832 reported samples
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
DeepSeek
Stirrup · max reasoning
Published margin ±1.5 · 852 reported samples
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI
Stirrup · max reasoning
Published margin ±1.7 · 847 reported samples
45 configurationsAgenticDated Mercor configurationsDisplay onlyUpdated October 15, 2026 capture
Mean Score table (45 configurations)
| Rank | Model / configuration | Score | Parameters (B) | Open / closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Opus 5.5AnthropicStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±1.5 · 832 reported samples | 88.30% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 2 | DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeekStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±1.5 · 852 reported samples | 86.70% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 3 | GPT-6 AstraOpenAIStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±1.7 · 847 reported samples | 86.70% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 4 | Fable 5.1AnthropicStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±1.7 · 851 reported samples | 86.60% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 5 | Sonnet 5.5AnthropicStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±1.7 · 819 reported samples | 86.50% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 6 | Grok 4.6xAIStirrup · xhigh reasoningPublished margin ±1.6 · 850 reported samples | 86.00% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 7 | Opus 5AnthropicStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±1.9 · 854 reported samples | 85.60% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 8 | Haiku 5.5AnthropicStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±1.6 · 834 reported samples | 85.50% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 9 | Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogleStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±1.7 · 849 reported samples | 85.20% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 10 | GPT-6 AstraOpenAIStirrup · xhigh reasoningPublished margin ±2.1 · 868 reported samples | 84.80% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 11 | Opus 4.8AnthropicStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±1.7 · 852 reported samples | 84.50% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 12 | Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogleStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±1.7 · 852 reported samples | 83.80% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 13 | Muse Spark 1.2MetaStirrup · xhigh reasoningPublished margin ±2 · 845 reported samples | 83.80% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 14 | GPT-6 SolOpenAIStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±1.9 · 852 reported samples | 83.50% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 15 | Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogleStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±1.6 · 848 reported samples | 83.50% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 16 | Qwen3.8-MaxAlibabaStirrup · xhigh reasoningPublished margin ±2 · 852 reported samples | 83.30% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 17 | Muse Spark 1.1MetaStirrup · xhigh reasoningPublished margin ±2 · 851 reported samples | 82.40% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 18 | Fable 5.1AnthropicStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±2.7 · 852 reported samples | 81.40% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 19 | GPT-6 LunaOpenAIStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±2.2 · 852 reported samples | 80.10% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 20 | GPT-5.5OpenAIStirrup · xhigh reasoningPublished margin ±5.2 · 852 reported samples | 79.90% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 21 | Opus 4.7AnthropicStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5.1 · 852 reported samples | 79.80% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 22 | Sonnet 4.6AnthropicStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.2 · 852 reported samples | 79.00% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 23 | Grok 4.5xAIStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.2 · 852 reported samples | 78.80% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 24 | Kimi K3KimiStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5.1 · 852 reported samples | 78.80% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 25 | Fable 5AnthropicStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5.1 · 852 reported samples | 78.60% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 26 | DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeekStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5 · 852 reported samples | 78.50% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 27 | GLM-5.2ZhipuStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5.2 · 852 reported samples | 78.20% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 28 | Sonnet 5AnthropicStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5.2 · 852 reported samples | 77.60% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 29 | GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5.2 · 852 reported samples | 77.10% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 30 | GPT-5.6 Sol (Pro)OpenAIStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5.3 · 852 reported samples | 75.60% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 31 | MiniMax-M3MiniMaxStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.3 · 852 reported samples | 74.80% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 32 | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeekStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5.1 · 852 reported samples | 74.30% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 33 | GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5.5 · 852 reported samples | 72.50% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 34 | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogleStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.2 · 852 reported samples | 72.40% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 35 | DeepSeek-V3.2DeepSeekStirrupPublished margin ±2.1 · 852 reported samples | 71.90% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 36 | Qwen3.5AlibabaStirrupPublished margin ±2.2 · 851 reported samples | 71.00% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 37 | Kimi K2.7 CodeKimiStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.4 · 852 reported samples | 70.10% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 38 | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogleStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.5 · 852 reported samples | 68.50% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 39 | MiniMax-M2.7MiniMaxStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.3 · 852 reported samples | 68.30% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 40 | InklingThinking MachinesStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.6 · 852 reported samples | 65.40% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 41 | Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIAStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±3.1 · 852 reported samples | 63.50% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 42 | GPT-5.4OpenAIStirrup · xhigh reasoningPublished margin ±5.7 · 852 reported samples | 60.00% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 43 | Kimi K2 (Thinking)KimiStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.6 · 852 reported samples | 54.10% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 44 | Gemma 4 31BGoogleStirrupPublished margin ±5.8 · 852 reported samples | 52.70% | Not reported | Unknown |
| 45 | GPT-OSS-120BOpenAIStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.5 · 852 reported samples | 38.80% | Not reported | Unknown |
How to read this Mercor evaluation
We captured Mercor's GDPval results on October 15, 2026. The table preserves 45 published configurations, their source identifiers, reasoning settings, and disclosed mean score values. These are results from Mercor's evaluation setup; we did not rerun them.
This dated source table is display only and does not enter overall or category rankings. Source configurations retain their external identity, including Pro descriptors and different effort settings.
The headline is the published mean score, which can include partial credit. It must not be read as a strict task-completion rate.
The row labels retain published error margins and sample counts when supplied. Missing margins and counts remain unreported; a sample count is not used to reconstruct a task denominator. Except where the dedicated source defines an interval, the confidence level is unreported. Equal displayed scores and overlapping margins do not establish statistical ties. Capture time does not establish individual evaluation dates.
The general methodology lists llm-as-a-judge (lmaaj) and a judge of Gemini 3 Flash Preview. Its run-count label is k = 4. The linked result page takes precedence where its setup differs, as noted above.
Snapshot
The published GDPval (Mercor) snapshot places Opus 5.5 first at 88.30%. The third row is 1.60 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 3.50 points, so many of the published results sit in a relatively narrow band.
45 configurations are shown for GDPval (Mercor). The benchmark falls in the Agentic category. We keep external benchmark mirrors separate from the weighted global scoring system, so these results remain source-specific evidence. GDPval (Mercor) is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.
About GDPval (Mercor)
Tasks
213 source-reported tasks
Format
Mean Score
Difficulty
Source-specific evaluation
The selected headline is Mean Score. Source model identifiers, effort settings, published margins, and reported sample counts remain attached to the source configuration. Public-set results and Mercor task extensions occupy separate tables.
Freshness and provenance
Version
GDPval; Mercor Mean Score
Refresh cadence
Reviewed dated source capture
Staleness state
Dated Mercor configurations
Question availability
Upstream task access and terms; only aggregate results mirrored
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
Questions
What does GDPval (Mercor) measure?
Producing workplace deliverables from reference files. This table shows Mercor-run configurations for reference and is excluded from model rankings.
Which model leads the published GDPval (Mercor) snapshot?
Opus 5.5 currently leads the published GDPval (Mercor) snapshot with 88.30% mean score. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.
How many models are evaluated on GDPval (Mercor)?
The October 15, 2026 capture snapshot contains 45 source configurations.
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
Read a sample issueJoin 5,600+ readers.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.