Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

GDPval — Mercor evaluation (GDPval (Mercor))

We show this table for reference; we do not rank on it.

Producing workplace deliverables from reference files. This table shows Mercor-run configurations for reference and is excluded from model rankings.

Evaluation results published by Mercor. Published evaluation aggregates only; task contents and dataset license grants are not included.

Mean Score on GDPval (Mercor) — October 15, 2026 capture

We mirror the published mean score view for GDPval (Mercor). Opus 5.5 leads the public snapshot at 88.30%, followed by DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (86.70%) and GPT-6 Astra (86.70%). We do not use these results to rank models overall.

45 configurationsAgenticDated Mercor configurationsDisplay onlyUpdated October 15, 2026 capture

Mean Score table (45 configurations)

Mean Score results for GDPval (Mercor)
RankModel / configurationScoreParameters (B)Open / closed
1Opus 5.5AnthropicStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±1.5 · 832 reported samples
88.30%
Not reportedUnknown
2DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeekStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±1.5 · 852 reported samples
86.70%
Not reportedUnknown
3GPT-6 AstraOpenAIStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±1.7 · 847 reported samples
86.70%
Not reportedUnknown
4Fable 5.1AnthropicStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±1.7 · 851 reported samples
86.60%
Not reportedUnknown
5Sonnet 5.5AnthropicStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±1.7 · 819 reported samples
86.50%
Not reportedUnknown
6Grok 4.6xAIStirrup · xhigh reasoningPublished margin ±1.6 · 850 reported samples
86.00%
Not reportedUnknown
7Opus 5AnthropicStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±1.9 · 854 reported samples
85.60%
Not reportedUnknown
8Haiku 5.5AnthropicStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±1.6 · 834 reported samples
85.50%
Not reportedUnknown
9Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogleStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±1.7 · 849 reported samples
85.20%
Not reportedUnknown
10GPT-6 AstraOpenAIStirrup · xhigh reasoningPublished margin ±2.1 · 868 reported samples
84.80%
Not reportedUnknown
11Opus 4.8AnthropicStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±1.7 · 852 reported samples
84.50%
Not reportedUnknown
12Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogleStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±1.7 · 852 reported samples
83.80%
Not reportedUnknown
13Muse Spark 1.2MetaStirrup · xhigh reasoningPublished margin ±2 · 845 reported samples
83.80%
Not reportedUnknown
14GPT-6 SolOpenAIStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±1.9 · 852 reported samples
83.50%
Not reportedUnknown
15Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogleStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±1.6 · 848 reported samples
83.50%
Not reportedUnknown
16Qwen3.8-MaxAlibabaStirrup · xhigh reasoningPublished margin ±2 · 852 reported samples
83.30%
Not reportedUnknown
17Muse Spark 1.1MetaStirrup · xhigh reasoningPublished margin ±2 · 851 reported samples
82.40%
Not reportedUnknown
18Fable 5.1AnthropicStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±2.7 · 852 reported samples
81.40%
Not reportedUnknown
19GPT-6 LunaOpenAIStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±2.2 · 852 reported samples
80.10%
Not reportedUnknown
20GPT-5.5OpenAIStirrup · xhigh reasoningPublished margin ±5.2 · 852 reported samples
79.90%
Not reportedUnknown
21Opus 4.7AnthropicStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5.1 · 852 reported samples
79.80%
Not reportedUnknown
22Sonnet 4.6AnthropicStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.2 · 852 reported samples
79.00%
Not reportedUnknown
23Grok 4.5xAIStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.2 · 852 reported samples
78.80%
Not reportedUnknown
24Kimi K3KimiStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5.1 · 852 reported samples
78.80%
Not reportedUnknown
25Fable 5AnthropicStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5.1 · 852 reported samples
78.60%
Not reportedUnknown
26DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeekStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5 · 852 reported samples
78.50%
Not reportedUnknown
27GLM-5.2ZhipuStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5.2 · 852 reported samples
78.20%
Not reportedUnknown
28Sonnet 5AnthropicStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5.2 · 852 reported samples
77.60%
Not reportedUnknown
29GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAIStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5.2 · 852 reported samples
77.10%
Not reportedUnknown
30GPT-5.6 Sol (Pro)OpenAIStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5.3 · 852 reported samples
75.60%
Not reportedUnknown
31MiniMax-M3MiniMaxStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.3 · 852 reported samples
74.80%
Not reportedUnknown
32DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeekStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5.1 · 852 reported samples
74.30%
Not reportedUnknown
33GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAIStirrup · max reasoningPublished margin ±5.5 · 852 reported samples
72.50%
Not reportedUnknown
34Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogleStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.2 · 852 reported samples
72.40%
Not reportedUnknown
35DeepSeek-V3.2DeepSeekStirrupPublished margin ±2.1 · 852 reported samples
71.90%
Not reportedUnknown
36Qwen3.5AlibabaStirrupPublished margin ±2.2 · 851 reported samples
71.00%
Not reportedUnknown
37Kimi K2.7 CodeKimiStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.4 · 852 reported samples
70.10%
Not reportedUnknown
38Gemini 3.1 ProGoogleStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.5 · 852 reported samples
68.50%
Not reportedUnknown
39MiniMax-M2.7MiniMaxStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.3 · 852 reported samples
68.30%
Not reportedUnknown
40InklingThinking MachinesStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.6 · 852 reported samples
65.40%
Not reportedUnknown
41Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIAStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±3.1 · 852 reported samples
63.50%
Not reportedUnknown
42GPT-5.4OpenAIStirrup · xhigh reasoningPublished margin ±5.7 · 852 reported samples
60.00%
Not reportedUnknown
43Kimi K2 (Thinking)KimiStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.6 · 852 reported samples
54.10%
Not reportedUnknown
44Gemma 4 31BGoogleStirrupPublished margin ±5.8 · 852 reported samples
52.70%
Not reportedUnknown
45GPT-OSS-120BOpenAIStirrup · high reasoningPublished margin ±5.5 · 852 reported samples
38.80%
Not reportedUnknown

How to read this Mercor evaluation

We captured Mercor's GDPval results on October 15, 2026. The table preserves 45 published configurations, their source identifiers, reasoning settings, and disclosed mean score values. These are results from Mercor's evaluation setup; we did not rerun them.

This dated source table is display only and does not enter overall or category rankings. Source configurations retain their external identity, including Pro descriptors and different effort settings.

The headline is the published mean score, which can include partial credit. It must not be read as a strict task-completion rate.

The row labels retain published error margins and sample counts when supplied. Missing margins and counts remain unreported; a sample count is not used to reconstruct a task denominator. Except where the dedicated source defines an interval, the confidence level is unreported. Equal displayed scores and overlapping margins do not establish statistical ties. Capture time does not establish individual evaluation dates.

The general methodology lists llm-as-a-judge (lmaaj) and a judge of Gemini 3 Flash Preview. Its run-count label is k = 4. The linked result page takes precedence where its setup differs, as noted above.

Snapshot

Mean Score45 configurationsMercor evaluationDisplay only

The published GDPval (Mercor) snapshot places Opus 5.5 first at 88.30%. The third row is 1.60 points behind. The broader top-10 range is 3.50 points, so many of the published results sit in a relatively narrow band.

45 configurations are shown for GDPval (Mercor). The benchmark falls in the Agentic category. We keep external benchmark mirrors separate from the weighted global scoring system, so these results remain source-specific evidence. GDPval (Mercor) is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.

About GDPval (Mercor)

Tasks

213 source-reported tasks

Format

Mean Score

Difficulty

Source-specific evaluation

The selected headline is Mean Score. Source model identifiers, effort settings, published margins, and reported sample counts remain attached to the source configuration. Public-set results and Mercor task extensions occupy separate tables.

Freshness and provenance

Version

GDPval; Mercor Mean Score

Refresh cadence

Reviewed dated source capture

Staleness state

Dated Mercor configurations

Question availability

Upstream task access and terms; only aggregate results mirrored

Dated Mercor configurationsDisplay only

BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.

Questions

What does GDPval (Mercor) measure?

Producing workplace deliverables from reference files. This table shows Mercor-run configurations for reference and is excluded from model rankings.

Which model leads the published GDPval (Mercor) snapshot?

Opus 5.5 currently leads the published GDPval (Mercor) snapshot with 88.30% mean score. BenchLM shows this benchmark for display only and does not use it in overall rankings.

How many models are evaluated on GDPval (Mercor)?

The October 15, 2026 capture snapshot contains 45 source configurations.

Last updated: October 15, 2026 capture · mirrored from the public benchmark leaderboard

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,600+ readers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.